首页|两种手术方式治疗高血压脑出血患者的临床效果及复发因素探讨

两种手术方式治疗高血压脑出血患者的临床效果及复发因素探讨

扫码查看
目的 探讨微创穿刺血肿引流术(MIPHD)与开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血(HICH)的效果以及复发的危险因素.方法 80 例HICH患者根据治疗方案的不同分为MIPHD组和开颅手术组,比较两组的治疗效果和临床指标,分析影响HICH患者复发的危险因素.结果 治疗后,两组的NIHSS评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05).Logistic回归分析显示,入院SBP、出血量、凝血机制异常是影响HICH患者术后复发的危险因素(P<0.05).结论 微创穿刺血肿引流术和开颅血肿清除术均可改善HICH患者的神经缺损程度,对于术前SBP过高、出血量偏大、凝血机制异常的患者,应警惕术后HICH的复发.
Discussion on the Clinical Effects of Two Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and the Recurrence Factors
Objective To explore the effects of minimally invasive puncture hematoma drainage(MIPHD)and craniotomy hematoma removal in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH)and the risk factors of recurrence.Methods 80 HICH patients were divided into MIPHD group and craniotomy group according to different treatment regimens.The therapeutic effects and clinical factors of the two groups were compared,and the risk factors affecting the recurrence of HICH patients were analyzed.Results After treatment,the NIHSS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that the SBP at admission,bleeding volume and abnormal coagulation mechanism were risk factors affecting postoperative recurrence of HICH patients(P<0.05).Conclusions Both minimally invasive puncture hematoma drainage and craniotomy hematoma removal can improve the degree of nerve defect of HICH patients.For patients with high preoperative SBP,large bleeding volume and abnormal coagulation mechanism,the recurrence of HICH after surgery should be alerted.

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhageMinimally invasive puncture hematoma drainageCraniotomy hematoma re-movalRecurrenceRisk factor

宋湖平、钟昕

展开 >

厦门大学附属第一医院杏林分院神经外科,福建厦门 361022

厦门大学附属第一医院杏林分院外科,福建厦门 361022

高血压脑出血 微创穿刺血肿引流术 开颅血肿清除术 复发 危险因素

2024

临床医学工程
国家医疗保健器具工程技术研究中心

临床医学工程

影响因子:0.193
ISSN:1674-4659
年,卷(期):2024.31(2)
  • 9