Comparison on Clinical Effects of Minimally Invasive Catheter Suction Liquefaction Drainage and Conventional Craniotomy Hematoma Removal in the Treatment of Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage
Objective To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive catheter suction liquefaction drainage and conventional craniotomy hematoma removal in the treatment of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods 110 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into control group(n=55)and observation group(n=55).The control group was treated with conventional craniotomy hematoma removal,and the observation group was treated with minimally invasive catheter suction liquefaction drainage.The operation related indicators,hematoma clearance rate and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The intraoperative blood loss of the observation group was less than that of the control group,and the operation time,complete hematoma disappearance time and hospitalization time were shorter than those of the control group(P＜0.05).The hematoma clearance rate and incidence of complications in the observation group were 94.55％and 10.91％,respectively,lower than 80.00％and 27.27％in the control group(P＜0.05).Conclusions Compared with conventional craniotomy hematoma removal,minimally invasive catheter suction liquefaction drainage can significantly reduce the intraoperative blood loss,shorten the operation time,complete complete hematoma disappearance time and hospitalization time,improve the hematoma clearance rate and reduce the incidence of complications in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据
