首页|电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法检测固体废物中铜、镍、铬、锌的前处理方法比较

电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法检测固体废物中铜、镍、铬、锌的前处理方法比较

扫码查看
为了探讨HJ781-2016(固体废物 22 种金属元素的测定 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱)标准中两种前处理方式(微波消解法与电热板消解法)对结果的影响,选取 Cu、Ni、Cr、Zn 等 4 种元素,采用有证标准物质和空白加标两种方式,对比两种消解方式的实验结果.为了避免实验过程带来的误差,所有的消解液均用一台仪器测定,实验涉及的试剂、耗材均为相同批次或同一瓶.在有证标准物质的测定中,微波消解法的相对误差为-18.7%~1.2%,高于电热板消解法的-0.7%~7.7%;在空白加标回收率的测定中,微波消解法的加标回收率为 80%~95%,电热板消解法为90%~106%.通过实验可知,电热板消解法的效果明显好于微波消解法.
Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometry Comparison of Pretreatment Methods for the Determination of Copper,Nickel,Chromium and Zinc in Solid Wastes by ICP-OES
In order to explore the influence of two pretreatment methods(microwave digestion method and electric hot plate digestion method)in the standard of"HJ781-2016"(Determination of 22 Metallic Elements in Solid Waste Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy)on the experimental results,four elements such as Cu,Ni,Cr and Zn were selected,and the experimental results of the two digestion methods were compared by using certified reference materials and blank spiking.The reagents and consumables involved in the experiment are all of the same batch or the same bottle;In the determination of certified reference materials,the relative error of microwave digestion method is-18.7%~1.2%,which is significantly higher than that of electric hot plate digestion method of-0.7%~7.7%.In the determination of the recovery rate of blank spiking,the recovery rate of microwave digestion method was 80%~95%,and that of electric hot plate digestion method was 90%~106%,and the effect of electric hot plate digestion method was significantly better than that of microwave digestion method.

Electrothermal plate digestionMicrowave digestionSolid wasteInductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer

靳艳芹

展开 >

上海市岩土工程检测中心有限公司,上海 200072

电热板消解 微波消解 固体废物 电感耦合等离子发射光谱仪

2024

云南化工
云南省化工研究院 云天化集团有限责任公司 云南煤化工集团有限公司 云南省化学化工学会

云南化工

影响因子:0.272
ISSN:1004-275X
年,卷(期):2024.51(5)
  • 5