首页|地方法治督察的量化评估:功能异化与体系应对——以X区经验为例

地方法治督察的量化评估:功能异化与体系应对——以X区经验为例

扫码查看
自 2019 年全国开展法治督察工作以来,X区结合法治督察制度与量化评估方法,形成一种法治督察量化评估机制,其融合"定量分析""定性评估"与"定期督察"的方法优势,在指标设计方式、评估主体的设定模式以及多元评估手段方面业已形成一套切实可行的试点经验。结合相关试点经验发现,地方法治督察量化评估的功能异化反映在地方政府督察的单方主导性、自上而下评估方式的局限以及评估内容的形式化倾向方面。然而,地方法治督察量化评估的真正功能,一方面,应聚焦于反映地方法治政府建设的实施问题,而非将结果作为衡量地方"法治GDP"的竞争性指标,直接同地方政府工作绩效关联;另一方面,要具备对地方法治建设的纠错功能,以便调整不同阶段的法治政府建设任务。据此,未来理应正确理解法治督察量化评估对地方法治状况的反馈作用,逐步剥离量化评估结果与业绩考核之间的利益关联。宜兼顾形式法治与实质法治之要求,保持法治督察量化评估结果的相对中立,反映法治督察的地方化元素。重视法治督察的公众参与,关注社会反馈效果。
Quantitative Assessment of Local Rule of Law Inspectorates:Functional Alienation and System Response
Since the launch of rule of law supervision work nationwide in 2019,Area X has combined the rule of law supervision system and quantitative assessment methods to form a quantitative evaluation mechanism for rule of law inspection,which integrates the advantages of"quantitative analysis","qualitative evaluation"and"regular inspection",and has formed a set of practical pilot experience in indicator design methods,setting modes of assessment subjects and multiple evaluation methods.Based on the relevant pilot experience,it is found that the functional alienation of the quantitative assessment of local rule of law inspectors is reflected in the unilateral dominance of local government inspectors,the limitations of top-down assessment methods,and the formal tendency of assessment content.However,the real function of the quantitative evaluation of local rule of law inspectors should focus on reflecting the implementation of local rule of law government construction,rather than using the results as a competitive indicator to measure local"rule of law GDP",which is directly related to the work performance of local governments.On the other hand,it is necessary to have the function of correcting errors in the construction of local rule of law,so as to adjust the tasks of rule of law government construction at different stages.Accordingly,in the future,it is necessary to correctly understand the feedback effect of the quantitative assessment of rule of law inspectors on the local rule of law situation,and gradually remove the interest relationship between the quantitative evaluation results and performance appraisal.It is appropriate to balance the requirements of formal rule of law and substantive rule of law,maintain the relative neutrality of the quantitative assessment results of rule of law inspectors,and reflect the localized elements of rule of law inspections.It is important to encourage the public to participate in rule of law inspection and pay greater attention to the effect of social feedback.

rule of law inspectorlocal rule of lawfunctional alienationquantitative assessment

潘鑫、周云

展开 >

四川大学法学院

贵州省毕节市人民检察院

法治督察 地方法治 功能异化 量化评估

四川省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目四川网络文化研究中心项目

JCSF2022-14WLWH22-23

2024

云南行政学院学报
云南行政学院

云南行政学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.413
ISSN:1671-0681
年,卷(期):2024.26(2)
  • 39