眼视光学杂志(英文版)2024,Vol.10Issue(2) :22-30.DOI:10.1186/s40662-022-00293-3

Application of total keratometry in ten intraocular lens power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes

Ling Wei Kaiwen Cheng Wenwen He Xiangjia Zhu Yi Lu
眼视光学杂志(英文版)2024,Vol.10Issue(2) :22-30.DOI:10.1186/s40662-022-00293-3

Application of total keratometry in ten intraocular lens power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes

Ling Wei 1Kaiwen Cheng 1Wenwen He 1Xiangjia Zhu 1Yi Lu1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Institute,Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University,Shanghai 200031,China;Key Laboratory of Myopia(Fudan University)Key Laboratory of MyopiaShanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration,National Health Commission,Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Shanghai 200031,China;State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology,Fudan University,Shanghai 200031,China
  • 折叠

Abstract

Background:The accuracy of using total keratometry(TK)value in recent IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes remained unknown.Methods:Highly myopic patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were prospectively enrolled in this prospective comparative study.At one month postoperatively,standard deviation(SD)of the prediction errors(PEs),mean and median absolute error(MedAE)of 103 highly myopic eyes were back-calculated and compared among ten formulas,including XGboost,RBF 3.0,Kane,Barrett Universal Ⅱ,Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0,Cooke K6,Haigis,SRK/T,and Wang-Koch modifications of Haigis and SRK/T formulas,using either TK or standard keratometry(K)value.Results:In highly myopic eyes,despite good agreement between TK and K(P>0.05),larger differences between the two were associated with smaller central corneal thickness(P<0.05).As to the refractive errors,TK method showed no differences compared to K method.The XGBoost,RBF 3.0 and Kane ranked top three when considering SDs of PEs.Using TK value,the XGboost calculator was comparable with the RBF 3.0 formula(P>0.05),which both presented smaller MedAEs than others(all P<0.05).As for the percentage of eyes within±0.50 Dor±0.75 D of PE,the XGBoost TK showed comparable percentages with the RBF 3.0 TK formula(74.76%vs.66.99%,or 90.29%vs.87.38%,P>0.05),and statistically larger percentages than the other eight formulas(P<0.05).Conclusions:Highly myopic eyes with thinner corneas tend to have larger differences between TK and K.The XGboost enhancement calculator and RBF 3.0 formula using TK showed the most promising outcomes in highly myopic eyes.

Key words

High myopia/Total keratometry/Cataract surgery/IOL power calculation

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家自然科学基金(82122017)

国家自然科学基金(81870642)

国家自然科学基金(81970780)

国家自然科学基金(81670835)

Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission(19441900700)

Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission(21 S31904900)

Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center(SHDC2020CR4078)

Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center(SHDC12019X08)

Fudan University"Outstanding"Program(2025)()

出版年

2024
眼视光学杂志(英文版)

眼视光学杂志(英文版)

ISSN:
参考文献量38
段落导航相关论文