首页|条带状铁建造的原始矿物组成:进展与问题

条带状铁建造的原始矿物组成:进展与问题

扫码查看
原生矿物信息作为前寒武纪条带状铁建造(BIF)研究的最基本命题,是研究BIF成矿规律及其早期地球环境效应的基础.长期以来,将低级变质且保存部分原始矿物及沉积结构的BIF作为研究对象,进而追踪BIF的原始矿物组成与后期演变过程一直是科学家们关心的关键问题.目前,关于BIF原始矿物组成主要有三种认识:三价铁的氢氧化物、铁硅酸盐(成分类似于铁蛇纹石和黑硬绿泥石)和绿锈.其中,绿锈为含二价和三价铁的过渡态化合物,仅可见于局部缺氧环境.由于绿锈的亚稳态性质,对于其在类似于前寒武纪的富硅海洋条件下转变成何种矿物及相关转变的具体途径仍不清楚.因而,当前关于原始铁质矿物的争议主要存在于三价铁的氢氧化物和铁硅酸盐之间,由此引发的对BIF成矿理论及其对古环境指示意义的理解也存在较大分歧.本文系统回顾和评述了近年来BIF原始矿物组成研究的重要进展;在此基础上,认为三价铁的氢氧化物应是BIF最为主要的原始矿物,其次为铁硅酸盐矿物,二者可能在地质历史时间和空间分布上具有差异性.然而,支持铁硅酸盐原始成因的现有证据主要为经典的岩相学特征,急需更多元素和同位素地球化学等方面的佐证.BIF中现有铁质矿物组合应是原始沉淀物在成岩-变质作用条件下发生转变的产物,相较于成岩早期的菱铁矿,磁铁矿可能形成时间偏晚,究竟是生物-有机质成因抑或是菱铁矿的热化学分解成因亟待深入探讨.在此背景下,同时考虑到华北作为国际上BIF的重要产区,且发育不同变质级别的太古宙末期BIF,可能完整记录了BIF的全部历程.,因此,可立足于华北,在已有的初步工作基础上,深度挖掘,力图为BIF矿物成因演变规律提供进一步约束,极大深化和推动我国BIF的成因研究.
Primary mineralogy of banded iron formation:Advances and issues
Precursor mineral information,as the most elementary proposition of Precambrian Banded Iron Formations(BIFs),is fundamental to studying the metallogenetic regularity of BIFs and their implications for the ancient environment on early Earth.Scientists have been always seeking one given BIF,that has undergone low-grade metamorphism with possible traces of primary minerals and sedimentary textures preserved,as a research object for a long time.Important information on primary mineral compositions and their post-depositional evolution could be obtained from this BIF.There are now mainly three views of the original sedimentary products of BIF:ferric(Fe(Ⅲ))oxyhydroxides,iron silicates approximating stilpnomelane and greenalite compositions,and green-rusts.Green rust is a transition chemical compound of Fe(Ⅱ)and Fe(Ⅲ)mostly found in local reducing environments.It remains unknown what specific type of mineral green rust could be transformed into in Precambrian silica-rich seawater and via what specific way green rust is transformed into other iron-bearing minerals.Therefore,green rust is not regarded as the main primary mineral of BIF and whether Fe(Ⅲ)oxyhydroxide or iron silicate is the precursor mineral of BIF remains hotly debated now.This would result in major differences when discussing the origin of BIF and its implications for the ancient environment.In this regard,we provide a detailed review and discussion on recent major advances on the primary minerals of BIF.Based on this,we propose that Fe(Ⅲ)oxyhydroxide is the most dominant primary mineral besides iron silicates.It is possible that both the two processes contributed to the formation of BIF,with one process dominant over the other at various times and in different depositional settings.However,major evidence for primary iron silicate minerals is derived from classic petrographic features so that multiple pieces of evidences such as element and isotope geochemical characteristics are needed.The present iron mineral assemblage of BIF is the product of transformation of the original precipitates of BIF during post-depositional diagenesis and metamorphism.By contrast with early diagenetic siderite,magnetite is the later.Whether magnetite was a product of bacterial iron reduction coupled to oxidation of organic matter or the thermal decomposition of siderite remains to be further explored.The North China is one of the most significant regions around the world hosting BIF.Most BIFs in China are Late Archean in age and have undergone different metamorphic grades.Given these above,bases on previous studies,we should focus on these BIFs and conduct a comprehensive investigation on them,in order to provide further constraints on the genetic evolution of minerals present in BIFs and finally greatly deepen and promote the research on the origin of BIFs in China.

Banded iron formationAdvancesIssuesPrimary mineralogy

王长乐、高亮、谢尚君、张新、彭自栋、董志国、白阳、张连昌

展开 >

中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,矿产资源研究院重点实验室,北京 100029

中国科学院大学地球与行星科学学院,北京 100049

太原理工大学矿业工程学院,太原 030024

条带状铁建造 进展 问题 原始矿物组成

国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目中国科学院基础前沿科学研究计划从0到1原始创新项目中国科学院青年创新促进会项目联合资助

4215010441872087ZDBS-LY-DQC037

2024

岩石学报
中国矿物岩石地球化学学会,中国科学院地质地球物理研究所

岩石学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.74
ISSN:1000-0569
年,卷(期):2024.40(1)
  • 5