首页|Gentlefile根管刷用于根管内消毒糊剂清除的效果分析

Gentlefile根管刷用于根管内消毒糊剂清除的效果分析

扫码查看
目的:分析Gentlefile根管刷与常规超声荡洗用于根管内消毒药物清除的效果,为临床上应用提供一定的参考.方法:将120个树脂根管模块根管预备至30#04锥度后封入消毒糊剂Vitapex及氢氧化钙糊剂,拍片确认糊剂已经完全充满根管后随机分为4组,即Vitapex超声清理组(Vitapex-US),Vitapex 糊剂Gentlefile根管刷清理组(Vitapex-GF),氢氧化钙糊剂超声清理组(Ca(OH)2-US)及氢氧化钙糊剂Gentlefile根管刷清理组(Ca(OH)2-GF),每组各30个树脂根管模块.超声清理组将超声荡洗尖置于距根尖孔3 mm位置进行清理2 min后配合10 mL冲洗液冲洗,根管刷清理组将根管刷同样置于距根尖孔3 mm位置进行清理根管2 min后配合10 mL冲洗液冲洗.所有操作均由同一位医生完成,随后拍摄根尖片,通过测量根管下端残留消毒药物的长度及根管侧壁存在糊剂残余的根管个数,比较两种方法对根管内消毒药物的清除效果.结果:两种方法均无法将根管下端的消毒药物完全清除.Vitapex-GF组根管下端残留消毒药物的长度及根管侧壁存在残余的根管数量百分比均较Vitapex-US组少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).Ca(OH)2-GF组根管下端残留消毒药物的长度及根管侧壁存在残余的根管数量百分比与Ca(OH)2-US组比较无明显统计学差异(P>0.05).Ca(OH)2-US组根管下端残留消毒药物的长度及根管侧壁存在残余的根管数量百分比均较Vitapex-US组少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:对于Vitapex糊剂,Gentlefile根管刷较超声荡洗具有更好的清理效果,而在常规使用超声清理的情况下,氢氧化钙糊剂较Vitapex糊剂更容易被清除.
Analysis of clinical effect of root canal brush on removal of disinfection drug from root canal
AIM:To provide a reference for clinical application by comparing the Gentlefile root canal brush and ultrasound therapy instrument for paste removal in root canal disinfection.METHODS:The 120 resin root canal modules were prepared to 30#04 taper with M3 nickel-titanium file,and full filled with the Vitapex paste and calcium hydroxide which were commonly used for root canal disinfection.Then the resin root canal modules were divided into 4 groups:vitapex ultrasonic cleaning Group(Vitapex-US),vitapex Gentlefile brush cleaning group(Vitapex-GF),calcium hydroxide paste ultrasonic cleaning group(Ca(OH)2-US)and Calcium hydroxide paste Gentlefile brush cleaning group(Ca(OH)2-GF).The ultrasonic cleaning groups placed the ultrasonic cleaning tip 3 mm away from the apical foramen for 2 minutes,and then rinsed with 10 mL flushing solution.The Gentlefile brush cleaning groups also placed the brush 3 mm away from the apical foramen,cleaned the root canal for 2 minutes,then washed the root canal with 10 mL flushing solution.All of these were done by a doctor and then the periapical film was taken.By measuring the length of residual antiseptic paste in the lower end of root canal and the number of residual drugs in the lateral wall of root canals,the removal effect of the two methods on root canal disinfection paste was compared.RESULTS:Both methods could not completely remove the disinfection paste at the lower end of the root canal,Gentlefile brush has a better cleaning effect on root canal filled with Vitapex,and the length of residual disinfection drugs at the lower end of the root canal and the number of residual amount on the side wall of the root canal were less than those in the ultrasonic cleaning group(P<0.05),the difference was statistically significant.There was no statistical difference between the two methods for calcium hydroxide paste in the root canal.The calcium hydroxide paste was easier to clean than vitapex paste(P<0.05),and the difference was statistically significant.CONCLUSION:As for vitapex paste,Gentlefile brush has a better cleaning effect as compared with the ultrasound.The calcium hydroxide paste is easier to clear than vitapex.

gentlefile root canal brushultrasonicvitapex pastecalcium hydroxide paste

王燕萍、许可、陈建国、陆乐

展开 >

江苏 苏州 215005 苏州大学附属口腔医院,苏州口腔医院牙体牙髓科

江苏 苏州 215005 苏州大学附属口腔医院,苏州口腔医院放射科

Gentlefile根管刷 超声 Vitapex糊剂 氢氧化钙糊剂

苏州市科技局指导课题项目苏州口腔医院院内课题面上基金项目

SKYD2023030SZKQYY22A02

2024

牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志
第四军医大学口腔医学院

牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志

影响因子:0.946
ISSN:1005-2593
年,卷(期):2024.29(5)
  • 7