首页|百令胶囊联合西医常规治疗糖尿病肾病的药物经济学研究

百令胶囊联合西医常规治疗糖尿病肾病的药物经济学研究

扫码查看
目的 评估百令胶囊联合西医常规疗法对比西医常规疗法治疗糖尿病肾病的经济性。方法 利用Meta分析探讨百令胶囊联合西医常规疗法(百令胶囊组)对比西医常规疗法(对照组)治疗糖尿病肾病的有效性和安全性。基于我国卫生体系角度,通过建立决策树模型开展成本-效果分析,综合评价2种治疗方案的短期经济性。有效性指标为总有效率,研究时限为3个月。采用单因素敏感性分析、概率敏感性分析及情境分析评价结果的稳定性。结果 Meta分析共纳入34项研究,涉及患者3 114例,结果显示,当治疗时间为3个月时,百令胶囊组总有效率高于对照组[RR=1。32,95%CI(1。25,1。39),P<0。001],且两组安全性相当。从增量成本-效果比来看,相比于单用西医常规疗法,百令胶囊联合西医常规疗法每提升一个效果所增加成本为5 233元;敏感性分析结果显示,百令胶囊每日剂量、百令胶囊组总有效率对结果的影响较大,当意愿支付阈值高于5 150元时,百令胶囊联合西医常规疗法更经济的概率高于50%。结论 当治疗时间为3个月时,与单纯西医常规疗法相比,百令胶囊联合西医常规疗法对意愿支付阈值高于5 150元的糖尿病肾病患者来说更具经济学价值。
Pharmacoeconomic study of Bailing capsules plus conventional therapy in treating diabetic kidney disease
Objective To evaluate economics of Bailing capsules combined with western medicine conventional treatment compared with western medicine conventional treatment in diabetic kidney disease.Methods Meta-analysis was performed to investigate clinical efficacy and safety of Bailing capsules combined with western medicine conventional treatment(Bailing capsules group)compared with western medicine conventional treatment(control group)in diabetic kidney disease.From the perspective of health system in China,cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by establishing a decision tree model.After the efficacy and safety results were obtained by meta-analysis,the short-term economics of the two treatment regimens were comprehensively evaluated.The efficacy index was the total effective rate and the time horizon was 3 months.One-way sensitivity analysis,probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were used to evaluate the robustness of the results.Results A total of 34 RCTs involving 3 114 patients were included in meta-analysis.The results of meta-analysis showed that when the treatment time was 3 months,the total effective rate of Bailing capsules group was higher than that of control group(RR=1.32,95%CI 1.25 to 1.39,P<0.001),while its safety was similar to control group.Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that compared with the conventional western medicine treatment alone,the ICER value of Bailing capsule combined with western medicine conventional treatment was 5 223 yuan,and sensitivity analysis showed that the dosage of Bailing capsules and the total effective rate of the two therapies had great influence on the results.When the willingness-to-pay value was higher than 5 150 yuan,the probability of Bailing capsules combined with western medicine conventional treatment was more economical than 50%.Conclusion When time horizon was 3 months,compared with western medicine conventional treatment,Bailing capsules combined with western medicine conventional treatment is more economical for patients with diabetic kidney disease who are willing to pay more than 5 150 yuan.

Bailing capsulesDiabetic kidney diseaseMeta-analysisCost-effectiveness analysisPharmacoeconomics

何玉梅、李薇、朱贺、韩晟

展开 >

北京大学医药管理国际研究中心(北京 100191)

北京大学药学院(北京 100191)

百令胶囊 糖尿病肾病 Meta分析 成本-效果分析 药物经济学

2024

药物流行病学杂志
中国药学会 武汉医药(集团)股份有限公司

药物流行病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.746
ISSN:1005-0698
年,卷(期):2024.33(3)