首页|氟替美维吸入粉雾剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的药物经济学评价

氟替美维吸入粉雾剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的药物经济学评价

扫码查看
目的 从我国卫生体系角度出发,评价氟替美维吸入粉雾剂治疗有急性加重风险的症状性慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的经济性。方法 基于IMPACT研究中国亚组数据构建4个健康状态的Markov模型,循环周期设定为3个月,模型模拟期限11年,通过已发表文献获得临床疗效、健康收益及成本数据。健康产出指标为质量调整生命年(QALY),以3倍我国2023年人均国内生产总值(GDP)为意愿支付阈值,采用成本-效用分析法评价氟替美维的经济性,并采用情境分析、单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析验证结果稳健性。结果 与糠酸氟替卡松维兰特罗相比,氟替美维治疗有急性加重风险的症状性慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者可节省成本8 118。66元,同时可以增加0。000 06 QALYs,氟替美维具有经济学优势。与乌美溴铵维兰特罗相比,氟替美维治疗多支付了 2 784。41元,且少获得0。000 45 QALYs,乌美溴铵维兰特罗更具经济性。情境分析结果进一步确定了模型的稳健性。敏感性分析结果显示,当氟替美维每周期药品成本下降至637。29元时,在3倍我国2023年人均GDP的意愿支付阈值下,氟替美维具有经济学效益。结论 对于有急性加重风险的症状性慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,氟替美维较糠酸氟替卡松维兰特罗更具经济性;而与乌美溴铵维兰特罗相比,氟替美维在适当降价后具有经济性。
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol powder for inhalation for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Objective To evaluate the economic value of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol(FF/UMEC/VI)powder for inhalation in the treatment of symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbation risk from the perspective of the Chinese health system.Methods Based on subgroup analysis of the China cohort in the IMPACT trial,a four-state lifetime Markov model was established with a 3-month cycle.The model simulation period was 11 years.Clinical efficacy,health benefits,and cost data were obtained through published literature.The health outcomes included quality adjusted life year(QALY).Using 3 times Chinas per capita gross domestic product(GDP)in 2023 as the willingness-to-pay threshold,the cost-utility analysis method was used for analysis the economic viability of FF/UMEC/VI.The scenario analysis,one-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were used to verify the robustness of the results.Results Compared with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol(FF/VI),FF/UMEC/VI in the treatment of symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbation risk saved costs 8 118.66 yuan and obtained an additional 0.000 06 QALYs,giving it an economic advantage.Compared with umeclidinium/vilanterol(UMEC/VI),FF/UMEC/VI treatment paid 2 784.41 yuan more and received 0.000 45 QALYs less,making UMEC/VI more cost-utility.The scenario analysis results further confirmed the robustness of the model.The sensitivity analysis results showed that when the drug cost of FF/UMEC/VI per cycle decreases to 637.29 yuan,FF/UMEC/VI had economic benefits under a willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times China's per capita GDP in 2023.Conclusion For patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk of acute exacerbation,FF/UMEC/VI is more cost-utility than FF/VI.Compared with UMEC/VI,FF/UMEC/VI has economic viability after price reducing.

Fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterolChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseMarkov modelCost-utility analysisPharmacoeconomic

丁雪茹、刘慧敏、何晓东、李华、李志浩

展开 >

湖北医药学院附属国药东风总医院药学部(湖北十堰 442000)

氟替美维 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 Markov模型 成本-效用分析 药物经济学

湖北省十堰市科技局引导性科研项目湖北陈孝平科技发展基金会青年科学专项基金

22Y75CXPJJH123001-2310

2024

药物流行病学杂志
中国药学会 武汉医药(集团)股份有限公司

药物流行病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.746
ISSN:1005-0698
年,卷(期):2024.33(7)