首页|决奈达隆预防心房颤动消融术后早期复发疗效及安全性的Meta分析

决奈达隆预防心房颤动消融术后早期复发疗效及安全性的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价决奈达隆用于预防心房颤动(AF)消融术早期复发的疗效及安全性。方法 计算机检索 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CNKI、WanFang Data和VIP数据库,搜集决奈达隆预防AF消融术后早期复发疗效及安全性的临床研究。检索时限均从建库至2024年4月16日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5。3软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入11项研究,其中3项随机对照试验和8项队列研究,包括1 534例患者。Meta分析结果显示,决奈达隆组与胺碘酮组消融术后AF早期复发率差异无统计学意义[RR=1。15,95%CI(0。90,1。47),P=0。25];与胺碘酮组相比,决奈达隆组出血发生率[RR=2。28,95%CI(1。08,4。81),P<0。05]和消化道反应发生率[RR=3。87,95%CI(1。39,10。74),P=0。009]均较高,而甲状腺功能异常发生率较低[RR=0。15,95%CI(0。06,0。40),P<0。001],两组消融术后心动过缓发生率、肝肾功能异常发生率及总的药品不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。与普罗帕酮组相比,决奈达隆组消融术后AF早期复发率较低[RR=0。31,95%CI(0。17,0。57),P<0。001],而两组的不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 当前证据表明,决奈达隆用于预防AF消融术后早期复发有效性与胺碘酮相当,但比普罗帕酮的疗效更好。在安全性方面,与胺碘酮相比,决奈达隆导致甲状腺功能异常的风险较低,但导致消化道不良反应和出血的风险较高。受纳入研究数量及质量的限制,上述结论尚待更多大样本、多中心、高质量的研究予以验证。
Efficacy and safety of dronedarone in preventing early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation:a Meta-analysis
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone in preventing early recurrence of atrial fibrillation(AF)after ablation.Methods PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect the clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of dronedarone in preventing early recurrence of AF after ablation from the inception to April 16,2024.Two researchers independently screened the literature,extracted data,and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies.Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.Results A total of three randomized controlled trials and eight cohort studies were ultimately included,including 1 534 patients.The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the early recurrence rate of AF after ablation between the dronedarone group and the amiodarone group(RR=1.15,95%CI 0.90 to 1.47,P=0.25).Compared with the amiodarone group,the dronedarone group had a higher incidence of bleeding(RR=2.28,95%CI 1.08 to 4.81,P<0.05),a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions(RR=3.87,95%CI 1.39 to 10.74,P=0.009)and a lower incidence of thyroid dysfunction(RR=0.15,95%CI 0.06 to 0.40,P<0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bradycardia,liver and kidney dysfunction,and total adverse drug reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with the propafenone group,the dronedarone group had a lower early recurrence rate of AF after ablation(RR=0.31,95%CI 0.17 to 0.57,P<0.001).However,there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between them(P>0.05).Conclusion Current evidence suggests that dronedarone is as effective in preventing early recurrence after AF ablation as amiodarone,but more effective than propafenone.In terms of safety,compared to amiodarone,dronedarone has a lower risk of thyroid dysfunction,but a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions and bleeding.Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies,more large sample,multi-center and high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

DronedaroneAtrial fibrillationAblationSystematic reviewMeta-analysis

庞樱容、梁帅、孙欣、萨日娜、杨丽丽、杨久宇

展开 >

内蒙古民族大学第二临床医学院(内蒙古呼伦贝尔 022150)

内蒙古林业总医院心内科(内蒙古呼伦贝尔 022150)

决奈达隆 心房颤动 消融术 系统评价 Meta分析

2024

药物流行病学杂志
中国药学会 武汉医药(集团)股份有限公司

药物流行病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.746
ISSN:1005-0698
年,卷(期):2024.33(8)