首页|罗普司亭治疗成人原发免疫性血小板减少症的快速卫生技术评估

罗普司亭治疗成人原发免疫性血小板减少症的快速卫生技术评估

扫码查看
目的 对罗普司亭治疗原发免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的有效性、安全性和经济性进行快速卫生技术评估,为决策者和临床实践提供循证依据。方法 计算机检索 PubMed、Cochrane LibraryA Embase、CNKI、WanFang Data、VIP 数据库及各大卫生技术评估机构官方网站,搜集罗普司亭治疗ITP的高质量临床证据与经济学评价文献,检索时限均为建库至2024年1月18日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价纳入文献的质量后,对汇总的研究结果进行定性描述分析。结果 共纳入14篇文献,其中系统评价/Meta分析8篇、药物经济学研究6篇。有效性方面,与安慰剂相比,罗普司亭治疗能显著提升ITP患者的血小板反应率、血小板持续反应率和平均血小板计数(P<0。05);与其他治疗ITP的药物相比,罗普司亭在提升患者血小板反应率和血小板持续反应率上未见显著优势(P>0。05)。安全性方面,与安慰剂比较,罗普司亭的严重不良事件发生率较低(P<0。05),不良事件发生率、出血事件发生率和血栓事件发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);罗普司亭与其他治疗ITP药物比较,不良事件发生率、严重不良事件发生率、出血事件发生率和血栓事件发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。多数经济学研究显示,艾曲泊帕比罗普司亭更具经济学优势。结论 罗普司亭治疗ITP有良好的有效性和安全性,经济性方面未显现出优势。
Romiplostim for the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults:a rapid health technology assessment
Objective To evaluate the efficacy,safety and economics of romiplostim for treating primary immune thrombocytopenia(ITP)by rapid health technology assessment,and to provide an evidence-based basis for policy makers and clinical practice.Methods PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,WanFang Data and VIP databases and the official websites of health technology assessment agency were electronically searched to collect high-quality clinical evidence and pharmacoeconomics evaluation literature of romiplostim for the treatment of ITP from inception to January 18,2024.Two researchers independently screened the literature,extracted information,and accessed the quality of included the literature,the extracted results were categorized and evaluated.Results A total of 14 literature were included,in which 8 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and 6 pharmacoeconomic studies.In terms of efficacy,treatment with romiplostim significantly elevated platelet response rate,sustained platelet response rate,and mean platelet count in patients with ITP compared with placebo(P<0.05).Romiplostim did not show a significant advantage in elevating patients'platelet response rate and sustained platelet response rate compared with other agents used to treat ITP(P>0.05).In terms of safety,the incidence of serious adverse events was statistically lower with romiplostim compared to placebo(P<0.05),while no significant differences were seen in the incidence of adverse events,bleeding events and thrombotic events(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events,serious adverse events,bleeding events,or thrombotic events when comparing romiplostim to other drugs for the treatment of ITP(P>0.05).From an economic standpoint,most studies considered eltrombopag to be more economic advantages than romiplostim.Conclusion Romiplostim has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of ITP,and no advantage was shown in terms of economy.

RomiplostimPrimary immune thrombocytopeniaEfficacySafetyEconomicRapid health technology assessment

李杰、谢君、韩怡、孟颖、高俪原、施晓卉、蒋志涛

展开 >

张家港市中医医院药学部(江苏张家港 215600)

罗普司亭 原发免疫性血小板减少症 有效性 安全性 经济性 快速卫生技术评估

江苏省药学会-天晴医院药学科研基金项目苏州市科技发展计划项目

Q202056SKYD2023228

2024

药物流行病学杂志
中国药学会 武汉医药(集团)股份有限公司

药物流行病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.746
ISSN:1005-0698
年,卷(期):2024.33(8)