首页|不同教学法在大学生心肺复苏及AED操作培训中的效果分析

不同教学法在大学生心肺复苏及AED操作培训中的效果分析

扫码查看
目的 通过数字密码教学法、情景模拟教学法和传统教学法对广西壮族自治区某高校大学生心肺复苏技能及自动体外除颤器(automatic external defibrillator,AED)操作进行培训并分析培训效果,探索有效开展高校大学生心肺复苏培训及AED操作培训的方法.方法 于2023年5-7月随机选取广西壮族自治区某大学150名大学生为研究对象,根据不同心肺复苏教学法将其随机分为数字密码教学法组、情景模拟教学法组和传统教学法组.使用Levene检验每组数据的方差齐性,符合正态分布且方差齐性的数据,采用F检验进行组间比较,方差不齐采用校正了的F检验,以及RxC列联表的x2检验等统计学方法分析3组学生在教学结束后理论和操作考核情况,比较3种教学方法的效果.结果 数字密码教学法组、情景模拟教学法组和传统教学法组的理论考试成绩,差异无统计学意义(F=1.775,P=0.173);3组的操作考核成绩,差异有统计学意义(F=8.625,P<0.001);数字密码教学法组、情景模拟教学法组的成绩均优于传统教学法组(差值=3.640、-3.700,P<0.05).3组在胸外按压、按压/通气比值、AED操作项目的考核失误率,差异有统计学意义(x2=10.786、12.250、8.625,P<0.05).结论 数字密码教学法、情景模拟教学法均能有效提高心肺复苏及AED操作的培训效果,显著减少操作失误率.
Effectiveness analysis of different teaching methods in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and AED operation training in college students
Objective To analyze the effectiveness of the training of digital code teaching method,scenario simulation teaching method,and traditional teaching method on cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)skills and automatic external defibrillator(AED)operation among college students in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,so as to explore effective methods for conducting CPR and AED operation training in college students.Methods From May to July 2023,150 college students from a university in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were randomly selected as research subjects.According to the different teaching methods for CPR,they were randomly divided into three groups:the digital code teaching method group,the scenario simulation teaching methods group,and the traditional teaching method group.Levene test was used to assess the homogeneity of variance for each group.For data that conformed to a normal distribution and had homogeneity of variance,the F-test was used for inter-group comparison,if the variance was uneven,a corrected F-test was applied,Chi-square tests of RxC contingency tables and other statistical methods were used to analyze the results of the theoretical and operational exams after teaching,comparing the effectiveness of the three teaching methods.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the theoretical exam results among the digital code teaching method group,the scenario simulation teaching method group,and the traditional teaching method group(F=1.775,P=0.173).However,the operational exam results showed a statistically significant difference among the three groups(F=8.625,P<0.001).The digital code teaching method group and the scenario simulation teaching method group both performed better than the traditional teaching method group(deviation=3.640,-3.700,P<0.05).Statistically significant differences were found in the error rates of chest compression,compression/ventilation ratio,and AED operation project among the three groups(x2=10.786,12.250,8.625,P<0.05).Conclusion Digital code teaching method and scenario simulation teaching method can both effectively improve the training outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and AED operation training,significantly reducing operational error rates.

College studentCardiopulmonary resuscitationAEDDigital code teaching methodScenario simulation teaching methodAnalysis

潘峥、姚宁、梁日成、肖明丽、赵海燕

展开 >

广西大学医院预防保健科,广西壮族自治区南宁 530004

大学生 心肺复苏 AED 数字密码教学 情景模拟教学 分析

2025

医学动物防制
中国民主促进会河北省委员会

医学动物防制

影响因子:0.553
ISSN:1003-6245
年,卷(期):2025.41(1)