摘要
目的：比较经桡动脉行介入术后使用两种不同方法压迫穿刺点止血的效果。方法将经桡动脉途径行介入术患者300例，随机分成 A 组和 B 组，每组各150例。A 组采用弹力绷带包扎止血，B 组采用动脉压迫止血器止血，观察两组并发症发生情况。结果两组患者均成功止血，A 组局部并发症多，肿胀（P ＜0．05）、指端麻木（P ＜0．01）发生率均明显高于 B 组。结论动脉止血器法与常规弹力绷带止血法相比，操作快速简便，止血效果安全可靠，并发症发生率低。
Abstract
Objective To observe the ef ect of two hemostasis fol owing transradial intervention.Method 300 patients who accepted transradial intervention were enrol ed and divided into two groups randomly:group A (with normal bandage,150 cases),group B (with artery compression tourniquet,150 cases).The appening of complications were observed.Result Two groups stanched bleeding successful y,the swel ing (P <0.05)and acroanesthesia (P <0.01)in group A were higher than in group B.Conclusion Compared with normal bandage,radial artery hemo-static device was easy and rapid to be operated,safe and ef ective with low rate of complications.
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据