Contemporary western global justice theory has its own advantages and disadvantages.Cosmopolitanism focuses on the central causes and solutions to the global poverty problem,but does not see that the fundamental solution to this problem is to change the capitalist mode of production.Nationalism emphasizes the interests of the nation-state itself,but ignores the interdependence of the various ethnic groups.New-Stoicism states that the international community should help poor countries meet the capacity needs of its members,yet no specific principles.Market socialism advocates to establish the market socialism in many countries,which violates historical materialism.In short,they all represent Western values.So,a reasonable theory of global justice should be inclusive and universally effective.In conclusion,reasonable theories of global justice need to consider the following:promoting world peace and development,reducing inequality in the world,eliminating global poverty,and establishing a just new international political and economic order.
global justicepeace and developmentglobal inequalityglobal poverty