首页|磁共振成像联合超声弹性成像在乳腺良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值

磁共振成像联合超声弹性成像在乳腺良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值

The value of magnetic resonance imaging combined with ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

扫码查看
目的:分析磁共振成像联合超声弹性成像鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性肿瘤的效果.方法:收集2022年8月—2023年8月聊城市传染病医院收治的98例乳腺肿瘤患者资料开展回顾性分析.患者术前均进行超声弹性成像、磁共振成像检查.以病理诊断结果为金标准,分析超声弹性成像、磁共振成像单一检查与联合检查对乳腺肿瘤的诊断效能;通过Kappa系数评价不同检查方法与病理诊断的一致性.结果:(1)病理诊断结果显示,98例乳腺肿瘤患者中恶性55例(恶性组),良性43例良性(良性组).超声弹性成像检查中良性组1~3分人数占比高于恶性组,4~5分人数占比低于恶性组(P<0.05).(2)磁共振成像检查中良性组病灶形态片状、圆形人数占比高于恶性组,边缘毛刺、不规则人数占比低于恶性组(P<0.05).(3)超声弹性成像、磁共振成像联合检查的灵敏度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值高于超声弹性成像单一检查(P<0.05).(4)超声弹性成像诊断与病理诊断一致性尚可(Kappa值=0.508),磁共振成像与病理诊断一致性较好(Kappa值=0.855),联合检查与病理诊断一致性极好(Kappa值=0.896).结论:乳腺良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断采取磁共振成像、超声弹性成像联合检查有更理想诊断效能.
Objective Analysis of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging combined with ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.Methods Retrospective analysis of data was collected from 98 breast tumor patients admitted to Liaocheng Infectious Disease Hospital from August 2022 to August 2023.All patients underwent preoperative ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations.Using histopathological results as the gold standard,to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography,magnetic resonance imaging single and combined examinations for breast tumors,Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency of different examination methods and pathological diagnosis.Results(1)The histopathological results showed that among 98 breast tumor patients,55 were malignant(malignant group)and 43 were benign(benign group).In ultrasound elastography examination,the proportion of patients in the benign group with 1~3 points was higher than that in the malignant group,and the proportion of patients in the 4-5 points was lower than that in the malignant group(P<0.05).(2)In magnetic resonance imaging examination,the number of lesions with flaky and round shape in benign group was higher than that in malignant group,and the number of edge burrs and irregular lesions was lower in malignant group(P<0.05).(3)The sensitivity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the combined examination of ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging were higher than those of a single examination of ultrasound elastography(P<0.05).(4)The consistency between ultrasound elastography diagnosis and pathological diagnosis is acceptable(Kappa value=0.508),while magnetic resonance imaging has good consistency with pathological diagnosis(Kappa value=0.855).The consistency between combined examination and pathological diagnosis is excellent(Kappa value=0.896).Conclusion The differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors by the combined examination of MRI and ultrasound elastography is more effective.

Breast benign and malignant tumorsMagnetic resonance imagingUltrasonic elastography

武传斌、刘延云

展开 >

聊城市传染病医院<聊城市肿瘤医院>影像科 山东 聊城 252000

聊城市人民医院神经科 山东 聊城 252000

乳腺良恶性肿瘤 磁共振成像 超声弹性成像

2024

影像研究与医学应用

影像研究与医学应用

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.8(7)
  • 9