首页|腰硬联合麻醉与全身麻醉对髋关节置换术患者的影响

腰硬联合麻醉与全身麻醉对髋关节置换术患者的影响

扫码查看
目的 比较髋关节置换术(THA)患者采用腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)与全身麻醉(GA)的效果。方法 选取2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 2 月在义马煤业集团股份有限公司总医院接受治疗的 84 例THA患者,以随机数字表法分为CSEA组(n=42,采用CSEA)与GA组(n=42,采用GA),对两组麻醉相关指标、认知功能、生命体征及不良反应进行比较。结果 CSEA组麻醉起效时间、完全阻滞时间、麻醉苏醒时间较GA组短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05),麻醉药物用量少于GA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05);术后 24 h两组简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE)评分较术前降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05),术后CSEA组MMSE评分高于GA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05);两组麻醉 30 min(T1)、缝合切口时(T2)、入麻醉苏醒室 30 min(T3)平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)高于麻醉前(T0),差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05),CSEA组在T1、T2、T3 时刻的MAP、HR低于GA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05);CSEA组不良反应发生率(4。76%)较GA组(26。19%)低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 CSEA应用于THA患者中,可缩短麻醉起效时间、完全阻滞时间、麻醉苏醒时间,减少麻醉药物用量,减轻对认知功能的损伤,保持MAP、HR水平平稳,减少不良反应发生。
The Impact of Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia and General Anesthesia on Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty
Objective To compare the effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA)and general anesthesia(GA)in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty(THA).Methods 84 patients who underwent THA in the General Hospital of Yima Coal Industry Group Co.,Ltd.from June 2021 to February 2023 were selected and divided into the CSEA group(n=42,using CSEA)and the GA group(n=42,using GA)by the random number table method.The anesthesia-related indicators,cognitive function,vital signs,and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared.Results The onset time,complete block time,and anesthesia recovery time of the CSEA group were shorter than those of the GA group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The amount of anesthetic used in the CSEA group was less than that in the GA group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)scores of the two groups decreased 24 hours after surgery compared with before surgery,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The MMSE score of the CSEA group was higher than that of the GA group after surgery,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)of the two groups were higher at 30 minutes after anesthesia(T1),when suturing the incision(T2),and 30 minutes after entering the anesthesia recovery room(T3)than before anesthesia(T0),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The MAP and HR of the CSEA group at T1,T2,and T3 were lower than those of the GA group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the CSEA group(4.76%)was lower than that in the GA group(26.19%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of CSEA in patients undergoing THA can shorten the onset time,complete block time,and anesthesia recovery time,reduce the amount of anesthetic used,alleviate the damage to cognitive function,maintain stable vital signs,and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions.

combined spinal-epidural anesthesiageneral anesthesiatotal hip arthroplasty

张璐、王漠

展开 >

义马煤业集团股份有限公司总医院 麻醉科,河南 三门峡 472300

腰硬联合麻醉 全身麻醉 髋关节置换术

2024

临床研究
西安交通大学

临床研究

影响因子:0.234
ISSN:2096-1278
年,卷(期):2024.32(8)