首页|缬沙坦、贝那普利分别联合胺碘酮治疗原发性高血压合并慢性心力衰竭的疗效对比

缬沙坦、贝那普利分别联合胺碘酮治疗原发性高血压合并慢性心力衰竭的疗效对比

扫码查看
目的 探究原发性高血压(EH)合并慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者分别应用缬沙坦联合胺碘酮、贝那普利联合胺碘酮的治疗效果。方法 选取焦作卫生医药学校附属医院 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间收治的 90 例EH合并CHF患者为研究对象,随机分为A组(n=45)和B组(n=45),A组患者应用缬沙坦联合胺碘酮治疗,B组患者应用贝那普利联合胺碘酮治疗。比较两组患者治疗前及治疗 3 个月后血压、心功能指标、血清炎症因子、心肌损伤指标水平;比较治疗期间两组患者药物不良反应发生率。结果 治疗 3 个月后,两组每日晨起左侧上肢收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)水平较治疗前均明显下降,且A组低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);治疗 3 个月后,两组左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)水平较治疗前有明显下降,左室射血分数(LVEF)均较治疗前明显增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),且A组LVEF水平明显高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),但A组、B组LVEDV水平差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗3个月后,两组患者血清白介素-1(IL-1)、白介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、B型钠尿肽(BNP)水平均较治疗前明显下降,且A组低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗期间两组药物不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 相较于贝那普利联合胺碘酮,缬沙坦联合胺碘酮治疗EH合并CHF效果突出,可进一步改善患者心功能,抑制炎性反应,恢复心肌损伤,用药安全。
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Valsartan and Benazepril Combined with Amiodarone in the Treatment of Primary Hypertension Complicated with Chronic Heart Failure
Objective To explore the therapeutic effects of valsartan combined with amiodarone and benazepril combined with amiodarone in patients with Essential Hypertension(EH)complicated with chronic heart failure(CHF).Methods 90 patients with EH complicated with CHF treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaozuo Health Medical College from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into group A(n=45)and group B(n=45).Patients in group A were treated with valsartan combined with amiodarone,and patients in group B were treated with benazepril combined with amiodarone.The blood pressure,heart function indicators,serum inflammatory factors,myocardial injury indicators of the two groups before and 3 months after treatment were compared;the incidence of drug adverse reactions during treatment in the two groups was compared.Results 3 months after treatment,the daily morning left upper limb systolic blood pressure(SBP)and diastolic blood pressure(DBP)levels of both groups were significantly lower than before treatment,and group A was lower than group B,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).3 months after treatment,the left ventricular end-diastolic volume(LVEDV)level of both groups was significantly lower than before treatment,and the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)was significantly higher than before treatment,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05),and the LVEF level of group A was significantly higher than that of group B,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05),but there was no statistically significant difference in the LVEDV level between group A and group B(P>0.05).3 months after treatment,the serum interleukin-1(IL-1),interleukin-6(IL-6),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),cardiac troponin I(cTnI),and B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP)levels of both groups were significantly lower than before treatment,and group A was lower than group B,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of drug adverse reactions during treatment between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with benazepril combined with amiodarone,valsartan combined with amiodarone has outstanding effects in the treatment of EH complicated with CHF,can further improve the heart function of patients,inhibit inflammatory response,restore myocardial injury,and is safe in medication.

primary hypertensionchronic heart failurevalsartanbenazeprilamiodarone

张娜娜、王秀伟

展开 >

焦作卫生医药学校附属医院(焦作市第六人民医院) 药剂科,河南 焦作 454150

焦作卫生医药学校附属医院(焦作市第六人民医院) 功能科,河南 焦作 454150

原发性高血压 慢性心力衰竭 缬沙坦 贝那普利 胺碘酮

2024

临床研究
西安交通大学

临床研究

影响因子:0.234
ISSN:2096-1278
年,卷(期):2024.32(8)