《战国策·韩策一》"秦韩战于浊泽"章中的两处语法问题
Two Grammatical Questions in the Chapter"Qinhanzhanyuzhuoze"(秦韩战于浊泽)in Zhan Guo Ce(战国策)
蒋陈唯1
作者信息
摘要
《战国策·韩策一》"秦韩战于浊泽"章内容又见于《史记·韩世家》、马王堆帛书《战国纵横家书》第二十四章.文中"纵韩为不能听我,韩必德王也,必不为雁行以来",鲍彪本、《纵横家书》无"纵"字且"韩必德王也"之"必"作"之",《韩世家》无"纵韩为不能听我"之"为".王念孙指出鲍本无"纵"字是,文章认为"韩之德王也"亦优于姚宏本及《韩世家》"韩必德王也".同章中"王听臣为之儆四境之内",《纵横家书》作"王听臣之为之警四境之内",诸家在此句读不一.文章认为《纵横家书》中多出的"之"字是衍文,句读仍当以"王听臣,为之儆四境之内"为长.
Abstract
The text of the chapter"Qinhanzhanyuzhuoze"(秦韩战于浊泽)in Zhan Guo Ce(战国策)is also seen in Shi Ji(史记)as well as Zhan Guo Zong Heng Jia Shu(战国纵横家书)from Mawangdui silk manuscripts of Han Dy-nasty.This article proposes that the text 韩为不能听我 of the Baobiao version(鲍彪本)and the Mawangdui version is better than 纵韩不能听我in the Shi Ji version.In the text of Baobiao version and Mawangdui version,the clause 韩之德王也,as the subject-predicate construction,expresses the reason of the main clause 必不为雁行以来.Moreover,the text 王听臣为之儆四境之内 is better than the text from the Mawangdui version,王听臣之为之儆四境之内.The extra"之"in the latter text is a superfluous word.Punctuating the text as王听臣,为之儆四境之内is a more preferable choice.
关键词
战国策/战国纵横家书/史记/马王堆Key words
Zhan Guo Ce/Zhan Guo Zong Heng Jia Shu/Shi Ji/Mawangdui引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据