首页|中乌民法典人格权立法的比较研究与借鉴

中乌民法典人格权立法的比较研究与借鉴

扫码查看
中国《民法典》和《乌克兰民法典》不约而同地规定了人格权编(卷),展示了 21世纪民法典的人文主义发展方向,更好地保护了人的尊严和享有的人格权.两国民法典的人格权立法都有自己的特点,也都存在各自的不足.中乌民法典对人格权的称谓有所不同;人格权在民法典中出现的位置不同,《乌克兰民法典》将某些属于公法的权利规定为人格权,这正是我国《民法典》所要避免的公权利与私权利不分的问题;在对人格权内容的具体规定上,两部民法典均有可相互借鉴之处.对两国民法典人格权立法进行比较研究,可以发现两国民法典人格权立法的共同特点,既可以增强我国立法的自信,也能够发现他国的优势和自身的不足,进而借鉴他国立法,完善我国的人格权立法,更好地保护我国民事主体的人格权和人格尊严.
A Comparative Study of the Civil Code of China and Ukraine in Legislation of Personality Rights
Both Chinese and Ukrainian Civil Codes coincidentally include the volume of Personali-ty Rights,showing the humanistic development of the Civil Code in the 21st century for better protecting human dignity and personality rights.With their respective features,the legislation of personality rights in the two Civil Codes still has some deficiencies.A comparison shows that the two Codes have different names for personality rights,which are put in different positions of the Codes.Ukrainian Civil Codes put some rights belonging to the public law under the personality right.It is what our Civil Code must avoid:public rights and private rights must not be muddled up together.The two Codes can refer to each other in terms of the contents of personality rights.This comparative study can,on the one hand,reveal the shared features of the two Codes and,more importantly,help improve our legislation of personality rights by referring to the advantages of the counterpart laws.

Chinese Civil CodeUkrainian Civil Codepersonality rights legislationlegislative statuslegislative content

杨立新

展开 >

广东财经大学法学院,广东广州 510320

中国民法典 乌克兰民法典 人格权立法 立法地位 立法内容

北京市社会科学基金重点研究项目

21FXA004

2024

扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)
扬州大学

扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.355
ISSN:1007-7030
年,卷(期):2024.28(1)
  • 48