首页|经阴道子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术的临床效果比较

经阴道子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术的临床效果比较

Comparison of treatment for uterine fibroids by vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy

扫码查看
目的:探讨经阴道子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术的临床效果,并进行总结。方法:本文选自2009年8月至2013年2月期间,本院收治的100例行子宫切除术患者,按手术方法随机分成经阴组和经腹组各50例,经阴组采用经阴道子宫切除术,经腹组采用传统的腹部全子宫切除术,观察所有患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后病率、术后住院时间以及肠功能恢复时间。结果:两组在手术时间、术后病率上无显著性差异(P>0.05);经阴组术中出血量、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间相较于经腹组(t 值分别为2.7688、6.0494、5.2132,P<0.01),有显著性差异。结论:经阴道子宫切除术比经腹子宫切除术治疗效果更好,可以临床推广使用。
Objective: To investigate clinical effect for uterine fibroids by vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: 100 case of uterine fibroids in our hospital from August 2009 to February 2013 were divided into vaginal hysterectomy group (50) and abdominal hysterectomy group (50). The operative time , blood loss, postoperative morbidity , postoperative hospital stay and recovery time of intestinal function were analyzed. Results: After treatment,the difference of operative time and postoperative morbidity between two groups was not significant ( P>0.05 ) ;The blood loss ,hospitalization time and anal exsufflation time of vaginal hysterectomy group were significantly lowetr than that of abdominal hysterectomy group(P<0.01).Conclusion:Vaginal hysterectomy treatment for uterine fibroids have significant clinical efficacy .

vaginal hysterectomyabdominal hysterectomyclinical effect

唐远会

展开 >

四川省资阳市安岳县妇幼保健院 四川 安岳 642350

经阴道子宫切除术 经腹子宫切除术 临床效果

2013

中国保健营养(中旬刊)
全国卫生产业企业管理协会

中国保健营养(中旬刊)

ISSN:1004-7484
年,卷(期):2013.(8)
  • 8