首页|手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的疗效

手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的疗效

扫码查看
目的:探讨手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析41例无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤病例,其中19例行非手术治疗,22例行手术治疗,比较两组患者治疗前后ASIA损害分级、JOA评分及神经功能改善情况,评价治疗效果。结果:非手术组和手术组治疗后ASIA损害分级、JOA评分均较治疗前提高;手术组治疗后3月及12月时神经功能改善率分别为(40±21)%和(59±30)%,非手术组同期神经改善率为(26±13)%和(42±27)%,手术组比非手术组神经功能改善明显,差异具有显著性意义(P﹤0.05)。结论:手术与非手术均能较好的治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤,但手术治疗效果更为确切。
The Clinical outcomes of Operative and non-operative Methods in the treatment of the cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation
Objective:To discuss the clinical outcomes of operative and non-operative methods in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation. Methods:The total of 45 patients with cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation treated were retrospectively analyzed, including 21 patients treated non-operatively, 24 patients treated operatively. The ASIA impairment scale and JOA scores of the two groups were compared, clinical effects were observed. Results:The ASIA impairment scale and JOA scores of the non-operative and operative groups were improved significantly compared to those of non-treatment. The curative probability of nerve function of the operative group in 3 month and 12 month after treatment was(40±21)% and(59±30)% respectively, while those of non-operative group in the same time was(26±13)% and(42±27)% respectively. The operative group got beter nerve function than that of the non-operative group, and the difference between the two groups was significant statisticaly.Conclusions:The methods of both operative and non-operative could get beter clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation, however, the operation is preferable.

Non fracture or dislocationCervical spinal cord injuryTreatmentClinical outcomes

无骨折脱位 颈髓损伤 治疗 疗效

2014

中国保健营养(中旬刊)
全国卫生产业企业管理协会

中国保健营养(中旬刊)

ISSN:1004-7484
年,卷(期):2014.(6)
  • 4