两种会阴切开缝合术的临床观察
The Clinical Observation of Two Suturing Techniques for Episiotomy
摘要
目的：探讨两种会阴切开缝合术的临床效果。方法：选在2012年5-11月在我院经阴道分娩的初产妇100例，50例行会阴切开术后可吸收及皮内连续缝合法为观察组；50例行会阴切开术后可吸收及皮肤丝线外缝法为对照组。记录两组在术后会阴伤口疼痛、首次排尿情况、住院时间、伤口愈合情况的差异。结果：观察组临床效果优于对照组，两组相关指标差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：可吸收及皮内连续缝合法对减轻术后会阴伤口疼痛、利于术后首次排尿、利于伤口愈合、减少住院时间、利于产妇休息，提高母乳喂养率，减少产后焦虑、创口美观，病人舒适有重要意义，有推广意义。
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of two suturing techniques for episiotomy.Methods:A total of 100 women were selected from those having vaginal delivery in Zhoupu Hospital from May to November in 2012. 50 women were randomly divided into the observation group adopting the intrademic continuous suturing technique and the rest were in the control group with normal suture. Compare the differences in the perineal pain after delivery, first micturition, length of hospital stay and the wound healing between two groups.Results:The observation group turned out to be beter than the control group in terms of the clinical effect. The differences of the indicators between two groups were statisticaly significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:The absorbable and intrademic continuous suturing technique could relieve the perineal pain after delivery, positively affect the first micturition and reduce the length of hospital stay. It also increases the chances of breastfeeding and reduces the postpartum anxiety. Besides, continuous suture is worth promoting as it is advantageous in terms of the appearance of the wound and the comfort of the patients.
关键词
会阴侧切术/皮内连续缝合法/传统丝线外缝法Key words
Episiotomy/Intrademic Continuous Suture/Normal Suture引用本文复制引用
出版年
2014
NETL
NSTL
万方数据