首页|地佐辛抑制全身麻醉气管插管反应的观察

地佐辛抑制全身麻醉气管插管反应的观察

扫码查看
目的:观察在腹腔镜手术全身麻醉诱导时,应用地佐辛抑制气管插管反应的效果及术后镇痛泵镇痛效果和患者清醒程度的影响。方法选着腹腔镜手术的患者50例,年龄在22-50岁之间,随即分为地佐辛组( D组)和芬太尼组( F组),每组25例。两组患者均采用静吸复合全身麻醉。麻醉诱导:患者进入手术室后静脉注射咪达唑仑0.05mg/kg,D组静脉注射地佐辛0.2-0.3mg/kg,F组静脉注射芬太尼4-6ug/kg,患者出现睡意后静脉注射依托咪酯0.4mg/kg,维库溴铵0.12mg/kg,达到插管条件后经口明视下行气管内插管。麻醉维持:经两组电脑输液泵分别静脉泵注丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、按需要间断静脉注射维库溴铵维持肌松。手术结束后接静脉电子泵。待达到拔管指证后拔出导管,并记录苏醒时间、拔出导管后恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制、寒战等不良反应。观察指标:分别观察记录两组患者麻醉诱导前(T0)气管插管时(T1)各时间段平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)的变化,待患者清醒拔出气管导管后,分别在苏醒即刻(t0)、苏醒后1小时(t1)对两组患者分别进行视觉模拟镇痛评分(VAS)的、布氏舒适度评分(BCS)和Bamsay镇静评分。结果两组患者在气管插管时(T1)都很好的抑制了气管插管反应,但F组患者MAP、HR下降均比较明显,与D组相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者苏醒时间和拔管时间比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);在苏醒即刻(t0),对两组患者进行视觉模拟镇痛评分(VAS)D组明显低于F组(P<0.05),进行布氏舒适度评分(BCS) D组明显高于F组(P<0.05);在苏醒后1小时(t1)两组患者VAS、BCS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术时应用地佐辛进行麻醉诱导可以达到足够的麻醉深度,对患者的插管应激反应起到了良好的抑制作用,并且在达到插管条件时对患者循环的影响较小,对患者的苏醒、拔管时间无明显影响,但拔管后患者表现嗜睡,拔管即刻患者镇痛评分较低与手术后镇痛泵起效时间连接更合理。
Objective To observe the induction of general anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery ,the application of dezocine inhibiting effect of endotracheal intubation response and postoperative analgesia analgesic efficacy and patient awake extent.Methods 50 patients with laparoscopic surgery in patients aged 22 to 50 years old,were randomly divided into dezocine group(D group)and fentanyl group(F),n=25.Two groups of patients were treated with inhalation general anesthesia.Induction of anes-thesia:The patient enters the operating room after the intravenous injection of midazolam 0.05mg/kg,D group intravenous dezocine 0.2 -0.3mg/kg,F group,intrave-nous fentanyl 4-6ug/kg,drowsiness after patients intravenous etomidate 0.4mg/kg,vecuronium 0.12mg/kg,achieve intubating conditions after oral endotracheal intuba-tion photopic down.Maintenance of anesthesia:After two computers was intravenous infusion pump infusion of propofol ,remifentanil,according to need intermittent intra-venous injection of vecuronium to maintain muscle relaxation .At the end of surgery followed by intravenous electronic pump .Be reached after extubation testify remove the catheter and record recovery time;remove the catheter nausea,vomiting,respiratory depression,chills and other adverse reactions.OUTCOME MEASURES:Two groups of patients were observed and recorded before induction of anesthesia(T0)intubation(T1)each time period mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR)chan-ges in the endotracheal tube to be removed after the patient awake,respectively,in awake instantly(t0),1 hour after awakening(t1)two groups of patients were on a visu-al analogue pain scale(VAS),and Brinell comfort score(BCS)and Bamsay sedation score.Results The patients in endotracheal intubation(T1)are very good suppression of tracheal intubation response,but the F group of patients MAP,HR decline were more obvious compared with the D group was significantly(P<0.05);patients were a-wake time and extubation time was not statistically significant(P>0.05);in the wake immediately(t0),two groups of patients with visual analog pain score(VAS)D was significantly lower than group F(P<0.05),Brinell comfort score(BCS)D group was significantly higher than the F group(P<0.05);in 1 hour after awakening(t1)pa-tients were VAS,BCS score difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion The application of laparoscopic surgery dezocine induction of anesthesia can achieve sufficient depth of anesthesia,the patient's stress response intubation played a good inhibition,and in the conditions to achieve intubation little effect on the circulation of patients,the patient awake extubation time had no significant effect,but after extubation patients showed lethargy,tracheal extubation in patients with post-operative pain scores were lower onset of analgesia pump connected to more reasonable .

dezocineLaparoscopic surgeryInduction of anesthesiaIntubation reactionPostoperative analgesia

金永俊、洪永柱、金兰

展开 >

图们市人民医院麻醉科,吉林 图们 133100

地佐辛 腹腔镜手术 麻醉诱导 插管反应 术后镇痛

2014

中国保健营养(上旬刊)
全国卫生产业企业管理协会

中国保健营养(上旬刊)

ISSN:1004-7484
年,卷(期):2014.(1)
  • 2
  • 1