对网络服务提供者版权过滤义务的审视——基于现行制度文本的解读
陈锦川
摘要
最高人民法院《关于审理侵害信息网络传播权民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》明确排除了网络服务提供者的主动监控义务.根据《民法典》的"通知删除规则","通知删除"义务是一项事后规则,网络服务提供者的责任是事后责任."通知删除规则"是包含了一系列规范或者程序的制度体系,将过滤当作必要措施将会破坏这一机制的平衡.识别和过滤技术要发挥作用,需要作品数据库支持;过滤技术无法做出法律评判;网络超越了国界,网络服务提供者难以履行监控义务、对网络上的信息进行过滤.
Abstract
The RTI judicial interpretation explicitly excludes the obligation of active monitoring by ISPs.According to the"notice-to-delete rule"of the Civil Code,the"Notice to Remove"obligation is an ex post facto rule,and the liability of the ISPs is ex post facto.The"notice-to-remove rule"is a system of norms or procedures,and treating filtering as a necessary measure would upset the balance of this mechanism.The identification and filtering techniques require a database of works in order to be effective;the filtering techniques cannot be legally judged;the Internet transcends national borders and it is difficult for ISPs to fulfill their obligation to monitor and filter information on the Internet.
关键词
网络服务提供者/过错/通知删除规则/版权过滤义务Key words
ISPs/fault/notice-to-delete rule/copyright filtering obligations引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据