摘要
《著作权法》第三条对于作品类型做了分类,每种类型对应特定的表现形式.作品分类在立法上的规范意义不仅在于示例,更在于确定特定作品的保护规则.不同类型的作品在权利归属、保护期限、合理使用与法定许可等方面可能对应不同的规定.作品保护范围虽然不限于具体的表现形式,但表现形式在一些情况下会对保护范围产生影响.因此,在作品侵权认定中,需要考虑实质性相似部分所对应的作品的类型,并在此基础上确定其权利归属、保护期限、保护范围等.
Abstract
Article 3 of the Copyright Law classifies the types of works,each corresponding to a specific form of expression.The normative significance of the classification of works in the Copyright Law lies not only in examples,but also in determining the protection rules for specific works.Different types of works may have different provisions on the ownership of rights,the term of protection,fair use and statutory permissions.Although the scope of protection of copyright is not limited to specific forms of expression,the forms of expression may have an impact on the scope of protection in some cases.Therefore,in the determination of copyright infringement,it is necessary to consider the type of work corresponding to the substantially similar part,and on this basis,determine the ownership of the rights,the term of protection,and the scope of protection.