摘要
"宋代是否出现版权"问题向来为学界讨论之焦点,其中最有名的当数安守廉与郑成思之争.安守廉认为"20世纪以前中国所有现存的表明国家努力为智力成果提供保护的事例都完全是为了维护皇权",郑成思则列举一些宋代刻印出版者向官府提交版权保护的努力进行反驳,其中就有《方舆胜览》中登载的版权保护告示.笔者认为,仅从这一告示来看,版权保护在宋代就已出现,其维护的是商品经济秩序,而非皇权.遗憾的是,该萌芽在此后数百年间未能破土而出,未发育成为现代意义上的版权制度.本文将围绕《方舆胜览》所载告示探究东西方版权保护在特许阶段的不同及中国古代未能发展出专门的版权立法的原因.
Abstract
The Issue of"the Existence of Copyright in the Song Dynasty"has always been a focus of academic discussion,with the most famous being the debate between An Shoulian(William P.Alford)and Zheng Chengsi.An Shoulian believes that"all the existing examples of the state's efforts to provide intellectual property protection before the 20th century were entirely for the maintenance of imperial power,"while Zheng Chengsi countered by citing some efforts by Song Dynasty publishers to seek copyright protection from the government,including the copyright protection notice published in the Fangyu Shenglan.The author believes that,based solely on this notice,copyright protection appeared in the Song Dynasty,which aimed to maintain the market economic order,rather than imperial power.Unfortunately,this germ did not break ground in the following several hundred years,and did not develop into modem copyright system.This article will explore the differences in copyright protection in the Song Dynasty and the West in the permissive stage,and the reasons why ancient China failed to develop a publishing right system.
关键词
版权史/版权保护告示/特许令状Key words
copyright history/copyright protection notices/licensing charters引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据