首页|地方志对马可·波罗记载问题的再考证——兼论方志解决历史疑难问题的研究空间

地方志对马可·波罗记载问题的再考证——兼论方志解决历史疑难问题的研究空间

扫码查看
马可·波罗曾在扬州做官3年,此为其重要经历.通过对扬州方志史料全面考索,可订正所载"忽都火者"乃马可·波罗的讹误,并考察"火者"一词历时义项变化,对照马可·波罗笔下的扬州空间书写,发现曾任江都达鲁花赤的"马马火者"是马可·波罗.同时亦可推断元代马可·波罗到扬州后政绩不彰,此可能是其在史志中"不载"的主要原因.马可·波罗宦迹问题对于百年来"马可·波罗到华"争议颇有助益,为解读马可·波罗提供方志新线索.
Investigations on Marco Polo Records in Local Chronicles-There is Research Space on How Local Records Help Solve Historical Problems
Marco Polo used to be an officer in Yangzhou for 3 years,which was an important experience in his life.By fully investigating local records and history materials of Yangzhou,the recorded"hudu Hoja"is mistaken as Marco Polo.By researching meaning changes of the word"Hoja"and comparing with Marco Polo's own writings about Yangzhou,"mama Hoja"who was darugaci in Jiangdu was Marco Polo.It could be inferred that Marco Polo didn't achieve well when administrating Yangzhou,which might explain why there were no records found in Yangzhou local chronicles.The officer trace of Marco Polo is helpful to explore the controversial problem whether Marco Polo came to China,which are new clues in local records to understand Marco Polo.

谢丹

展开 >

浙江师范大学人文学院

马可·波罗 扬州 地方志

2024

中国地方志
中国地方志指导小组办公室

中国地方志

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.099
ISSN:1002-672X
年,卷(期):2024.(3)