首页|TROPIS改良挂线法与切开挂线术治疗高位肛瘘疗效比较

TROPIS改良挂线法与切开挂线术治疗高位肛瘘疗效比较

Comparison of Efficacy of Modified Thread-Drawing Method in TROPIS and Incision Thread-Drawing Surgery for Treatment of High Anal Fistula

扫码查看
目的:观察比较经肛括约肌间切开术(TROPIS)改良挂线法与切开挂线术治疗高位肛瘘的疗效.方法:将120例高位肛瘘患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组60例.对照组患者采用切开挂线术治疗,观察组患者采用TROPIS改良挂线法治疗,比较2组患者的疗效、术后并发症发生率以及术后复发率.结果:观察组患者总有效率率高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组患者术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05),观察组患者术后6、12个月复发率低于对照组(P<0.05).结论:TROPIS改良挂线法治疗高位肛瘘疗效显著、术后并发症发生率和复发率低,值得临床推广应用.
Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of modified thread-drawing method in transanal open-ing of intersphincteric space(TROPIS)and incision thread-drawing surgery for the treat-ment of high anal fistula.Methods Total 120 patients with high anal fistula were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 60 cases in each group.The control group was treated with inci-sion thread-drawing surgery,and the observation group was treated with modified thread-drawing method in TROPIS.The efficacy,incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence rate of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The postoperative recurrence rate of the ob-servation group was lower than that of the control group 6 and 12 months after operation(P<0.05).Conclusion The modified thread-drawing method in TROPIS has significant effect on high anal fistula,low incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

High anal fistulaTransanal open-ing of intersphincteric spaceModified thread-drawing methodIncision thread-drawing surgeryComparison of efficacy

赵永锋

展开 >

山东省东营市广饶县中医院(山东广饶 257300)

高位肛瘘 经肛括约肌间切开术 改良挂线法 切开挂线术 疗效比较

2024

中国肛肠病杂志
中华中医药学会肛肠分会 山东中医药学会

中国肛肠病杂志

影响因子:0.131
ISSN:1000-1174
年,卷(期):2024.44(4)
  • 5