首页|信息不对称下按需服务平台拥有不同类型代理人时的动态激励契约

信息不对称下按需服务平台拥有不同类型代理人时的动态激励契约

扫码查看
针对信息不对称下按需服务平台同时拥有兼职与全职代理人时的动态激励问题,以平台服务商誉为状态变量,建立动态的委托代理模型,运用最优控制方法求解平台及代理人的均衡策略,通过参数分析和对比分析得到的研究结果表明:当平台由单一兼职或全职代理人转变为同时拥有两类代理人时,代理人的服务努力水平均会降低,平台对其激励强度应提高,平台向兼职代理人收取的担保金和向全职代理人提供的固定报酬随代理人对平台激励契约的敏感性而不同;且平台在三种模式下的最优服务努力投入并不相同。通过数值仿真发现,单一兼职代理人模式下按需平台收益最优,而全职代理人模式下按需平台的盈利能力最弱,同时拥有两类代理人模式时按需平台的收益次优。研究结论可为按需平台设计动态激励契约提供一定的参考。
Dynamic Incentive Contract of On-Demand Service Platform with Different Types of Agents under Asymmetric Information
In recent years,with the rapid development of platform economy,on-demand service platforms such as instant grocery delivery,meal delivery and ride-hailing have gradually become a part of daily life.The agents of these platforms may be part-time or full-time,they have the autonomy of service effort,and it is private information,the platform cannot directly observe the degree of the agent's effort.And,with the change of market environment,the operation and market position of platform enterprises are not static,but more dynamic and continuous,and the incentive contract of the platform to the agent is not invariable,but constantly changing under the influence of many external factors.In this paper,for the dynamic incentive contract problem of on-demand platform with both part-time and full-time agents under asymmetric information,considering the participation constraints and incentive compatibility constraints of agents,taking the change of platform service goodwill as the state variable,the dynamic incentive contract models of platform employing part-time,full-time and simultaneous agents are constructed respectively by using principal-agent theory,the optimal control method is used to solve the equilibrium strategy of platform and agent under different situations,the effects of service cost,information asymmetry,platform service goodwill and other related parameters are revealed,and the optimal decisions under different principal-agent models are compared and analyzed.The results suggest that:(1)When the service cost coefficient and risk sensitivity coefficient of a certain type of agent increase,the service effort level of this type of agent in different situations will decrease,and the platform enterprise should reduce the incentive intensity to it,but the platform does not need to change the incentive intensity to another type of agent.(2)When the initial service goodwill of the platform is low,the optimal trajectory of the guarantee money and incentive contract charged by the platform to the part-time agent will first monotonically increase and then stabilize with the passage of time,while the fixed reward and the corresponding incentive contract provided by the platform to the full-time agent will monotonically decrease and then stabilize with the passage of time;However,when the initial service goodwill of the platform is high,the optimal trajectory of the variables related to part-time and full-time agents in the early stage is just opposite to that when the initial service goodwill is low.(3)When the platform changes from employing part-time or full-time agents to employ-ing both types of agents at the same time,the service effort level of the agents will decrease,and the incentive intensity of the platform should be increased,but the guarantee money charged by the platform to the part-time agents and the fixed remuneration provided to the full-time agents should be strategically optimized and adjusted according to the service provider's sensitivity to the platform's incentive contract.In addition,the optimal service effort of the platform under the three principal-agent modes are different.(4)Finally,the numerical simulation shows that the platform is the most advantageous in the mode of entrusting part-time agents,while the profitability is the weakest in the mode of full-time agents,but it is the second best in the mode of entrusting two types of agents at the same time.The results provide good insights for on-demand platforms in the design of incentive contracts.

sharing economydynamic incentive contractpart-time and full-time agentsoptimal control theoryprincipal-agent model

孙中苗、徐琪、张艳芬

展开 >

东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海 200051

共享经济 动态激励契约 兼职与全职代理人 最优控制论 委托代理模型

国家社会科学基金项目国家自然科学基金重点项目中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金、东华大学研究生创新基金项目

21BGL01471832001CUSF-DH-D-2021062

2024

中国管理科学
中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会 中科院科技政策与管理科学研究所

中国管理科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.938
ISSN:1003-207X
年,卷(期):2024.32(5)