首页|零售平台自有品牌与制造商渠道策略的竞合博弈分析

零售平台自有品牌与制造商渠道策略的竞合博弈分析

扫码查看
针对品牌竞争和渠道竞争引发的利益冲突问题,考虑了零售平台是否引入自有品牌以及制造商的三种渠道策略,并基于消费者的品牌偏好与渠道偏好,构建了两阶段的Stackelberg博弈模型,进而分析双方在竞合博弈中策略交互行为。结果表明:零售平台的自有品牌策略依赖于产品采购成本和制造商的渠道策略;面对自有品牌竞争,制造商仅选择零售平台销售产品,但较高的佣金率可能会损害零售平台的利润;平台中无自有品牌且直销渠道建设成本较低时,制造商有动机实施双渠道策略,但差异化的渠道零售价格不一定对制造商有利;尽管制造商的策略选择先动优势导致了囚徒困境问题,但消费者较高的自有品牌偏好改善了双方的利润。
Co-opetition Game Analysis Between Store Brand Strategy of Platform and Selling Channel Strategy of Manufacturer
With the increasing willingness of consumers to shop online,a growing number of retail platforms not only serve as service providers to operate an agency channel,but also sell competing store brands through their own platforms.At the same time,many manufacturers who used to sell national brands through the retail platform have also established direct online channel to sell the products.As a result,there is not only brand competition between the manufacturer and the retail platform but also selling channel competition between the direct online channel and the platform's online channel.Therefore,two strategies of the retail platform are considered:introducing store brand and non-introducing store brand.Given the platform's strategy,the manufacturer has three channel strategies:selling products through the retail platform,selling products through the online direct channel,and selling products through the dual channels.Combining with consumers'willing-ness to pay for different selling channels and brands,two-stage game models are constructed in different strategy scenarios.The games are solved by backward induction and equilibrium selling prices and profits are obtained.The optimal strategies of both players can be identifiedby comparing and analyzing these equilibrium outcomes.The results suggest that when the unit purchasing cost of the store brand is low,the platform has an incentive to introduce thebrand and can obtain higher revenues by charging commission feesfrom manufacturer and selling store brand products.However,a higher commission rate may hurt its profit.Even if the online platform introduces the competing store brand,themanufacturer sells national brand product through the platform only,and the selling price and market demand of the national brand are both higher.However,when there is no store brand on the platformand the channel establishment cost is low,the manufacturer sells national brands through dual channels.Nevertheless,it is worth noting that the manufacturer's profit will be worseas the price differ-ence between the dual channels increases.Furthermore,compared with the case where the platform firstly decides brand strategy,the case where the manufacturer firstly decides channel strategy results in a prisoner's dilemma,whereas the higher preference of store brand can achieve the profit improvement of both players.

co-opetition gameretail platformnational brandprisoner's dilemma

王鹏、王要玉、王建才

展开 >

苏州大学商学院,江苏 苏州 215021

北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京 100081

竞合博弈 零售平台 制造商品牌 囚徒困境

国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目江苏省"333高层次人才培养工层"项目江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目

723711807207113771871024KYCX21_2923

2024

中国管理科学
中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会 中科院科技政策与管理科学研究所

中国管理科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.938
ISSN:1003-207X
年,卷(期):2024.32(9)