首页|大转子后半截骨入路与标准Kocher-Langenbeck入路治疗髋臼后壁骨折的疗效比较

大转子后半截骨入路与标准Kocher-Langenbeck入路治疗髋臼后壁骨折的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的:比较大转子后半截骨入路与标准Kocher-Langenbeck(K-L)入路治疗髋臼后壁骨折的临床疗效,探讨治疗髋臼后壁骨折的更优入路。方法:回顾性分析自2019年1月至2021年6月收治的47例髋臼后壁骨折患者,根据手术方法分为大转子后半截骨组(试验组)及标准K-L入路组(对照组)。试验组24例,男16例,女8例,年龄(42。00±4。52)岁,受伤至手术时间(6。75±1。15)d。对照组23例,男16例,女7例,年龄(41。00±5。82)岁;受伤至手术时间(7。09±1。20)d。观察比较两组患者住院总时间、手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、骨折复位质量(Matta标准)、髋关节外展肌力、髋关节功能(Merle d'Aubigne-Postel评分)、术后两组并发症及异位骨化发生率。结果:所有患者获得6个月随访,两组手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05),但试验组手术时间较对照组更短(P<0。05)。两组术后6个月骨折复位质量、髋关节功能评价差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。试验组髋关节外展肌力优于对照组(P<0。05)。两组术后并发症发生率、异位骨化发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论:相比于标准K-L入路法,大转子后半截骨入路可缩短手术时间,对术后髋关节外展肌力恢复更好,术中对涉及髋臼后壁较为粉碎的骨折或臼顶骨折暴露视野更加,提高骨折解剖复位率,为临床治疗髋臼后壁骨折提供新的思路令另患者可早期行功能锻炼。
Comparison of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langen-beck approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langenbeck(K-L)approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures and to explore a more optimal approach for the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures.Methods Total of 26 patients with posterior ac-etabulum wall fractures were retrospectively analysed and divided into two groups:the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter group(test group)and the standard K-L approach group(control group).In the test group,there were 24 patients including 16 males and 8 females with an average age of(42.00±4.52)years old,the time of injury to surgery was(6.75±1.15)d.In the control group,there were 23 patients including 16 males and 7 females with an average age of(41.00±5.82)years old,the time of injury to surgery was(7.09±1.20)days.The total hospital stay,length of incision,operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative drainage,discharge,fracture reduction quality(Matta criteria),hip abduction muscle strength,hip func-tion(Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score),postoperative complications and the incidence of ectopic ossification were compared.Results All cases were followed up for 6 months.There was no significant difference in incision length,intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage between two groups(P>0.05).However,the operation time of the test group was shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in fracture reduction and hip function between two groups(P>0.05).The hip abduction muscle strength of test group was better than that of control group(P<0.05).In addition,there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and heterotopic ossification between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the standard K-L approach,the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach can shorten the operative time,has better recovery of the postoperative hip abduction muscle strength,ex-poses the view of the fracture involving the more comminuted posterior acetabulum wall or the fracture of the roof of the socket,improved the rate of fracture anatomical repositioning,provides a new idea for the clinical treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures,and allows patients to perform functional exercises at an early stage.

Posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanterKocher-Langenbeck approachPosterior acetabulum wall fracturesPerimeter indicatorsHip function

张津、申建军、海祥、刘川源、周文杰、陈志伟

展开 >

甘肃省中医院创伤骨二科,甘肃 兰州 730050

甘肃中医药大学,甘肃 兰州 730030

大转子后半截骨 Kocher-Langenbeck入路 髋臼后壁骨折 围术期指标 髋关节功能

甘肃省卫生健康行业科研计划项目

GSWSKY2021-035

2024

中国骨伤
中国中西医结合学会,中国中医研究院

中国骨伤

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.876
ISSN:1003-0034
年,卷(期):2024.37(8)