首页|多部门视角下偏向性技术进步对中国收入分布的影响

多部门视角下偏向性技术进步对中国收入分布的影响

扫码查看
中国收入分布在1995-2018年发生了阶段性演变:2007年之前,中、底层收入份额不断转移至顶层;2007年之后,底层收入份额转移至中层.本文认为偏向性技术进步在其中发挥了重要作用,为此构建了一个包含异质性个体的多部门一般均衡模型,通过理论分析与数值模拟系统考察了偏向性技术进步对中国收入分布的影响.研究发现,不同类型的偏向性技术进步对收入分布的作用机制存在明显差异,并且总体上可以较好地解释这段时期中国收入分布演变的阶段性特征.具体而言,2007年之前,资本、技能偏向性技术进步共同导致中、底层收入份额转移至顶层;2007年之后,技能偏向性技术进步导致底层收入份额转移至中顶层,劳动偏向性技术进步部分抵消了前者对底层和顶层的影响,二者共同作用最终导致底层收入份额转移至中层.本文进一步考察了这段时期中国经济高速增长背后收入分配格局的演变,发现1995-2007年经济增长所引致的收入上升掩盖了分配格局的失衡,顶层群体收入增幅最大;2007-2018年收入分配格局有所改善,中层群体从增长中获益最多.本文有助于增进对中国收入分布和不平等演变的理解,也为在高质量发展中实现共同富裕提供了政策启示.
The Impact of Biased Technological Progress on Income Distribution in China from a Multi-Sector Perspective
This paper documents that between 1995 and 2018 the evolution of income distribution in China exhibits an interesting phased pattern.For 1995-2007,shares of income held by high-income households increased at the expense of their low-and middle-income counterparts.By contrast,for 2007-2019,changes in the income distribution were largely characterized by a shift in shares from the left to the middle.Existing measures for income inequality in China have been primarily based on aggregate statistics,such as the Gini coefficient,but they are far from sufficient for gaining insight into the inequality dynamics.The current paper fills part of this gap by addressing the following set of questions.What factors account for the observed fluctuations in China's income distribution?What are their operating channels?How do they affect different income groups?This study highlights one plausible factor by focusing on the role of industry-specific biased technological progress(BTP).To this end,a multi-sector heterogeneous-agent general equilibrium model is developed to evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the distributional implications of BTP.The takeaways are threefold.First,there is a notable heterogeneity in the way different types of BTP shape the income distribution.Second,the parameterized model well reproduces the observed phased changes in China's income distribution.More precisely,from 1995 to 2007,capital-and skill-biased technological progress jointly drove the observed income concentration.In comparison,from 2007 to 2018,skill-biased technological progress shifted income shares from the bottom to the middle and top,but the distributional consequences were partly offset by labor-biased technological progress.Third,an explicit exercise is proposed to decompose the growth of household income into components driven by aggregate expansion and distributional shift,respectively.It shows that from 1995 to 2007 household income increased significantly thanks to the rapid economic expansion,but the growth is uneven with households from the top of the income spectrum being the primary beneficiaries.Income inequality improved during the period 2007-2018,with the middle group benefiting the most from growth.The results suggest that as China enters the new normal of economic development,it is crucial to remain vigilant about the associated distributional ramifications when leveraging emerging technologies to drive growth.Policymakers need to carefully balance the relationship between growth and inequality,and constantly optimize distribution mechanisms.This paper enriches the existing literature by quantifying the contribution of BTP to the evolution of income distribution in China,and provides policy lessons for achieving common prosperity.

income distributionbiased technological progressshare of capital incomeskill premiumGini coefficient

徐少锋、兰森、张紫洋、于泽

展开 >

中国人民大学经济学院

收入分布 偏向性技术进步 资本收入份额 技能溢价 基尼系数

教育部人文社会科学基地重大项目

23JJD790012

2024

中国工业经济
中国社会科学院工业经济研究所

中国工业经济

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.932
ISSN:1006-480X
年,卷(期):2024.(6)