首页|非标违约与城投债发行定价

非标违约与城投债发行定价

扫码查看
本文基于2015-2022年地方融资平台公司城投债发行和非标资产违约数据,通过构建多时期双重差分模型,考察融资平台非标资产违约对城投债定价和平台市场化转型的影响.研究发现,地区首次发生非标资产违约后,属地融资平台的城投债发行利差显著提高,该效应在隐性担保预期高、房地产投资占比高的地区更显著.机制检验显示,非标违约揭示平台信用风险后,投资者对城投债的隐性担保预期下降,推动信用风险被有效纳入城投债的定价中,城投债长期以来的溢价发行现象得到有效平抑,意味着融资平台改革转型过程中,非标资产违约的触发一定程度上能够起到促进平台真实信用风险释放、激活市场定价机制的作用.长期看,非标资产违约产生的定价效应和市场化效应推动了融资平台降低经营风险和提高投资效率.进一步检验显示,地方政府的非市场化救助行为将强化投资者的"刚兑信仰",导致城投债定价被进一步扭曲,这一发现为近年来制定和实施的一揽子市场化化债政策提供了重要的经验证据.本文为监管层和地方政府深入认识融资平台所面临的化债困境、防范化解重大金融风险及推进融资平台的市场化转型提供了新的视角.
Non-standard Debt Contracts Default and the Pricing of Municipal Corporate Bonds
Promoting the market-oriented transformation of local government financing vehicles(LGFVs)is a crucial step in China's efforts to mitigate and manage local implicit debt risks.Over the past decade,LGFVs have played a pivotal role in financing infrastructure development and social welfare projects through the issuance of municipal corporate bonds(MCBs)and non-standard debt instruments,which contribute to regional economic growth and social development.However,since LGFVs primarily invest in public welfare projects that generate limited and unstable cash flow,they struggle to manage debt independently.As a result,local governments have accumulated significant implicit debts,while crowding out of financial resources has driven up private sector financing costs,posing threats to China's high-quality economic development.Although MCBs have not experienced any substantial defaults in recent years,frequent defaults on non-standard debt contracts of LGFVs have aroused wide attention.On one hand,such defaults severely destabilize financial markets.On the other hand,they shake investors'rigid payment expectations,leading to the re-pricing of LGFV formal debts,i.e.,MCBs.The non-standard debt default events promote the market-oriented transformation of LGFVs,accelerate the exposure of implicit debt burdens on local governments,and curb excessive local government borrowing.Based on data on MCB issuance and non-standard debt defaults by LGFVs from 2015 to 2022,this paper uses a multi-period difference-in-differences(DID)model to assess the impact of LGFV non-standard debt defaults on MCB pricing and the market-oriented transformation of LGFVs in China.The findings reveal that after the first occurrence of non-standard default in a region,the issuance spread of MCBs by local LGFVs rises sharply.This effect is more pronounced in areas with strong implicit guarantee expectations and heavy reliance on real estate investment.The mechanism analyses indicate that non-standard defaults speed up the exposure of LGFVs'credit risks,reducing investors'reliance on implicit guarantees and incorporating these risks more accurately into MCB pricing.These changes help correct the long-standing overpricing of MCBs and effectively activate market-based pricing mechanisms.Additionally,non-standard defaults have prompted LGFVs to lower operational risks and improve investment efficiency.Further analysis shows that non-market-oriented bailouts by local governments after non-standard default events may reinforce investors'rigid payment expectations,further distorting MCB pricing.The findings offer valuable empirical support for China's market-based debt resolution policies since 2023.This study makes contributions from three perspectives.Firstly,this paper sheds light on the market-oriented transformation of LGFVs by examining how non-standard debt defaults influence their financing costs.The analysis clarifies the short-term and long-term economic consequences of credit risk exposure for these entities.Secondly,the study offers valuable insights for academia,related industries,and regulators by addressing the challenge of disentangling bond pricing from issuers'fundamentals and macroeconomic conditions,given the implicit guarantee premium.This paper quantifies the implicit cost of rigid payment expectations and demonstrates how non-standard defaults affect MCB pricing and its long-term impact.These findings provide fresh perspectives on assessing LGFV risks and offer practical policy guidance for local governments in debt resolution and risk management.Thirdly,this paper focuses on the unique characteristics of LGFVs and the risks tied to non-standard debt defaults,which is an area underexplored in existing literature.Developing a theoretical framework and providing empirical evidence,this paper bridges a critical gap and lays the foundation for future studies in this field.

non-standard debt contracts defaultmunicipal corporate bondsissuance spreadoverpricinglocal government financing vehicles

刘津宇、梁洛铭、毛捷、柏金春

展开 >

对外经济贸易大学中国金融学院

对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院

非标资产违约 城投债 发行利差 溢价率 融资平台

2024

中国工业经济
中国社会科学院工业经济研究所

中国工业经济

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.932
ISSN:1006-480X
年,卷(期):2024.(10)