首页|"双碳"目标约束下的能耗双控到碳排放双控:规制工具、效应模拟与政策评价

"双碳"目标约束下的能耗双控到碳排放双控:规制工具、效应模拟与政策评价

扫码查看
能耗双控转向碳排放双控是中国应对气候变化、推动经济社会全面低碳化转型的重大制度设计.本文基于可计算一般均衡模型研究发现,能耗双控与碳排放双控政策均能有效减少碳排放,降低能源消费水平,促进能源消费结构低碳转型,推动产业结构合理化,但会对经济造成损失.从能耗双控转向碳排放双控,能够进一步减少碳排放,降低碳排放峰值,有效释放清洁能源消费潜力,提高非化石能源消费占比,促进清洁能源产业发展,但未必能够推动产业结构合理化,对经济增长的促进作用也存在不确定性.当"双碳"目标超越能耗目标成为主要政策约束时,能耗双控与碳排放双控叠加组合方式将收敛为碳排放双控.碳排放双控采用的不同规制工具及其组合方式是决定碳排放双控目标下经济社会效应的关键影响因素,使用不同规制工具产生了差异化的碳减排经济成本,以及不同程度的低碳能源消费推动作用.本文还对能耗双控与碳排放双控的政策效应做了综合评估,发现能耗双控转向碳排放双控的综合政策效应更优.本文为推动能耗双控向碳排放双控制度转变、合理运用碳排放双控规制工具及组合提供了重要启示.
From Dual Control of Energy Consumption to Dual Control of Carbon Emissions under the Constraints of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals:Regulatory Tools,Effect Simulation and Policy Evaluation
With sustained economic development,the continuous rise in carbon dioxide emissions poses a significant global challenge.As a major carbon emitter,China aims to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060.To better implement the goals,China proposed a policy shift from dual control of energy consumption to dual control of carbon emissions.However,there is currently a lack of quantitative analysis on the dual control of energy consumption and the dual control of carbon emissions.Critical questions remain about whether the shift can achieve the expected policy objectives and whether the comprehensive policy effects of dual control of carbon emissions are superior to those of dual control of energy consumption.This paper uses a computable general equilibrium model to simulate the policy objectives of dual control of energy consumption and dual control of carbon emissions.It finds that both policies can effectively reduce CO2 emissions,lower energy consumption,promote the low-carbon transformation of energy consumption structure,and promote the rationalization of industrial structure,although they result in economic losses.The shift can further reduce carbon emissions,lower the carbon emission peak,effectively release the potential for clean energy consumption,increase the proportion of non-fossil energy consumption,and promote the development of the clean energy industry.However,this shift may not necessarily promote the rationalization of industrial structure,and its impact on economic growth remains uncertain.When the"dual carbon"goals surpass energy consumption goals to become tight constraints,the combined approach of dual control of energy consumption and dual control of carbon emissions will converge to dual control of carbon emissions.The regulatory tools and their combinations under the dual control of carbon emissions are key factors determining the socio-economic effects under the goals of dual control of carbon emissions.Different regulatory tools mainly produce differentiated economic costs of carbon reduction and varying degrees of promotion of low-carbon energy consumption.Through a multi-dimensional integrated evaluation method,this paper compares the comprehensive effects of the two policies and concludes that the overall policy effect of the shift from dual control of energy consumption to dual control of carbon emissions is superior.This paper provides insights into promoting the institutional shift from dual control of energy consumption to dual control of carbon emissions and the rational application of regulatory tools and their combinations under the dual control of carbon emissions.

dual control of energy consumptiondual control of carbon emissionscarbon emission reductiontransformation of the energy consumption structure

姜春海、闫振好、王敏

展开 >

东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心

能耗双控 碳排放双控 碳减排 能源消费结构转型

2024

中国工业经济
中国社会科学院工业经济研究所

中国工业经济

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.932
ISSN:1006-480X
年,卷(期):2024.(11)