首页|大学教师缘何冷落教学——基于高校教学类政策文本的分析

大学教师缘何冷落教学——基于高校教学类政策文本的分析

扫码查看
大学教师冷落教学已成普遍现象.基于政策工具和教学要素二维框架,以49所"双一流"建设高校、121所普通本科院校在2013-2023年间制定的170份教学类政策为分析对象,探究这一现象形成的政策逻辑.研究发现,这类政策一定程度上不利于激发教师的教学热情,也不利于其教学能力的提升.政策工具上,强制型工具占主导而激励型和建设型工具占比较低.教学要素上,教学内容和教学评价占比较低,且教学方法重技术轻人文.二维交叉上,教学评价缺乏激励型工具,教学内容缺乏组织建设型工具,教学方法则缺乏能力建设型工具.政策工具和教学要素的非均衡以及二者交叉的低匹配都会导致教师陷入不愿教、不会教的窘境.未来,高校政策的制定应加大激励型工具的使用力度,实现教学政策工具的全过程供给,提高政策工具与教学活动各要素的匹配度.
Why do University Faculties Neglect Teaching:Based on the Analysis of University Teaching Policy Text
It is a common phenomenon that faculties neglect teaching.Based on the two-dimensional framework of policy tools and teaching elements,this study takes 170 teaching policies formulated by 49"Double First-Class"construction universities and 121 common undergraduate universities during 2013-2023 as analysis objects to explore the policy logic formed by this phenomenon.This study finds that such policies are not conducive to stimulating faculties'teaching enthusiasm and improving faculties'teaching ability to a certain extent.From the perspective of policy tools,coercive tools predominate while incentive and construction tools are relatively low.From the perspective of teaching elements,teaching content and teaching evaluation account for a relatively small proportion,and teaching methods are more technical than humanistic.From the perspective of two-dimensional intersection,teaching evaluation lacks incentive tools,teaching content lacks organization building tools,and teaching methods lack capacity building tools.The disequilibrium of policy tools and teaching elements and the low cross matching between them will lead to the dilemma that faculties are unwilling to teach and unable to teach.In the future,the university policy formulation should increase the use of incentive policy tools,realize the supply of teaching policy tools in the whole process and improve the matching degree between policy tools and various elements of teaching activities.

university facultyteachingdilemmapolicy analysis

肖瑜、刘振天

展开 >

厦门大学高等教育发展研究中心,福建厦门 361005

大学教师 教学 困境 政策分析

教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目

22JJD880034

2024

中国高教研究
中国高等教育学会

中国高教研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.316
ISSN:1004-3667
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 1
  • 17