《学位法》学术复核制度独立性的理论阐释与实践进路
Theoretical Interpretation and Practical Construction of the Independence of Academic Review System in the Academic Degree Law
董储超1
作者信息
- 1. 南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京 210023;江苏师范大学教育法研究中心,江苏徐州 221116
- 折叠
摘要
《学位法》第四十条通过学术复核制度的创新设计,赋予学位申请人以学术复核权,但相关法律规范的非完备性导致学术复核权易受学位授予单位的实质限制,学术复核制度的非独立性风险由此显现.学术复核制度的独立性理论能够有效回应学术复核制度的理论争议,促使学位纠纷更好预防与化解,亦具备一定的理论和规范基础.全面建构学术复核制度的独立性理论,需要将保障学位申请人的程序主体地位作为逻辑前提,进而确保学术复核权的独立行使与学术复核程序的公正运转.应体系化设立完备的回避、学术复核办法制约以及评估审查机制,明确允许学位申请人寻求外部救济,相关救济机关应将学术复核程序是否具备独立性作为审查重点.
Abstract
Article 40 of the academic degree law empowers degree applicants with the right of academic review through the innovative design of the academic review system,but the incompleteness of relevant laws and regulations makes the academic review right vulnerable to the substantive restrictions of degree-granting units,and the non-independence risk of the academic review system thus appears.The independence theory of academic review system can effectively respond to the theoretical disputes of academic review system and promote the better prevention and resolution of degree disputes,and has a certain theoretical and normative basis.In order to ensure the independent exercise of academic review right and the fair operation of academic review procedure,it is necessary to take the procedural subject status of degree applicants as the logical premise to fully construct the independence theory of academic review system.Complete mechanisms for withdrawal,academic review restriction and evaluation review mechanism should be systematized,degree applicants should be explicitly allowed to seek external relief,and the relevant relief authorities should focus on the independence of the academic review process.
关键词
《学位法》/学术复核制度/学术复核权/学术复核程序/独立性Key words
academic degree law/academic review system/academic review right/academic review procedures/independence引用本文复制引用
基金项目
2022年国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题(BAA220169)
南京师范大学优秀博士学位论文选题资助计划项目(YXXT23-010)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据