首页|无方向制约的横向剪切干涉波前重建方法研究

无方向制约的横向剪切干涉波前重建方法研究

扫码查看
为了解决横向剪切干涉波前重建技术受剪切方向限制的问题,提出了无方向制约的横向剪切干涉波前重建方法。首先对得到的任意两个剪切干涉图进行Radon变换得到剪切方向,在此基础上,将剪切方向参数引入现有的波前重建方法中,建立基于任意两方向剪切干涉图的波前重建模型,并给出波前重建算法流程。为了验证所提方法的有效性,仿真分析了多组任意两个方向剪切干涉图的波前重建精度,并与基于直角坐标轴正交方向上的两个剪切干涉图的波前重建结果进行比较。结果表明,在不改变波前重建精度的情况下,实现了基于任意两方向横向剪切干涉图的波前重建,有效消除了现有波前重建方法受剪切干涉图方向性的限制,避免了剪切方向与坐标轴之间的偏差所带来的波前重建误差。最后通过实验验证所提方法的正确性。
Wavefront-Reconstruction Method of Lateral-Shear Interference Without Directional Constraints
Objective The lateral-shear-interference technique is utilized widely for measuring wavefront aberration because of its simple structure,common interference,and minimal susceptibility to external environmental interference.However,the shear interferogram reflects only the gradient of the test wavefront's shear direction,and the wavefront information to be measured cannot be directly obtained from the interferogram.Wavefront-reconstruction methods based on modal and zonal methods typically depend on orthogonal shear interferograms to reconstruct the wavefront being measured.However,discrepancy exists between the shear direction and the orthogonal coordinate axis of the shear interferogram obtained in an actual experiment.If the wavefront to be measured is reconstructed using the method above,then the accuracy of the reconstruction will be affected.To overcome the limitation of lateral-shear interferometric wavefront-reconstruction technology,which is constrained by the shear direction,and to improve the flexibility of experimental operation,a method for lateral-shear interferometric wavefront reconstruction without directional constraints is proposed.This approach is validated via simulation analysis and experiments.Method We introduced a shearing-direction parameter and utilized the underlying algorithm for differential Zernike polynomial wavefront reconstruction to facilitate wavefront reconstruction based on any two directions of lateral-shear interferograms.First,the shear-direction angle θ of the two shear interferograms was calculated using the Radon transform.Subsequently,the differential wavefront information of the measured wavefront was obtained from the shear interferogram in the specified shear direction.The relationship between the differential wavefront and the differential Zernike polynomial in a specific direction was established using θ.The wavefront coefficients to be measured were determined using the least-squares method for wavefront reconstruction.The flowchart of the wavefront-reconstruction algorithm was provided,along with an analysis of the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction for several sets of arbitrary two-direction shear interferograms based on simulation and experiment.The wavefront-reconstruction results were compared with those based on two shear interferograms in the orthogonal directions of the right-angle coordinate axis.The validity of the proposed method was analyzed based on the residual peak-to-valley(PV)and root mean square(RMS)values.Result and Discussions The shear interferogram(Fig.5)of the measured wavefront(Fig.4)along any direction is obtained via simulation.Since the distribution of the measured wavefront is unknown during the experiment,the angle of between the two shear directions used for reconstruction is varied from 2° to 90°.Based on the results,the reconstructed wavefront exhibits the largest PV and RMS residual errors when the angle between the two shear directions is 2°,as compared with the results of a reconstructed shear interferogram in the orthogonal direction.When the angle between the two shear directions exceeds 12°,the wavefront-reconstruction accuracy of the method proposed herein aligns with that of the shear interferogram in the orthogonal direction.Additionally,the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction remains unchanged as the angle between the two shear directions increases(Table 1,Fig.7).Meanwhile,the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction decreases as the noise levels increase at various angles(Fig.8).When the relative noise level reaches 100%,the PV and RMS residual error values of the wavefront reconstruction are λ/40 and λ/285,respectively.Under the same noise level,the wavefront-reconstruction results are consistent regardless of the angle used.When the shear interferogram used for reconstruction presents shear-rate deviation,the reconstruction error of the wavefront to be measured decreases as the angle between the two shear interferograms increases(Fig.9).When the shear-rate deviation is less than 4%and the shear-direction angle exceeds 10°,the reconstructed theoretical PV and RMS residual error values exceed λ/50 and λ/250,respectively,without any noise or systematic error.Furthermore,the accuracy of the method is confirmed experimentally.The lateral-shear interferogram aligns closely with the reconstructed surface-shape features in any two directions with respect to the orthogonal direction(Fig.13),and the measurement results are almost identical.When considering the angle between the two shear interferograms,the accuracies of the self-compared reconstructed PV and RMS exceed 0.029λ and 0.0051λ,respectively(Table 2).Conclusions This paper introduces an unconstrained wavefront-reconstruction method to overcome the limitations of existing lateral-shear-interferogram reconstruction methods.These methods are constrained by the directionality of the shear interferogram,which restricts their accuracy.The proposed method can achieve wavefront reconstruction using any two lateral interferograms and eliminates the necessity to consider the effect of shear-direction error on the reconstruction accuracy.Moreover,the proposed method is used to process any two directions of lateral-shear interferograms obtained experimentally.When compared with wavefront-reconstruction results based on orthogonal shear interferograms,the accuracy of the reconstructed PV and RMS values are 0.029λ and 0.0051λ higher,respectively,thus validating the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

lateral shear interferencewavefront reconstructionshear interferogramdirectional constraints

任柯鑫、田爱玲、王红军、刘丙才、朱学亮、王思淇、张郁文、苏媛、徐金涛

展开 >

西安工业大学光电工程学院陕西省薄膜技术与光学检测重点实验室,陕西西安 710021

横向剪切干涉 波前重建 剪切干涉图 方向制约

2024

中国激光
中国光学学会 中科院上海光机所

中国激光

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.204
ISSN:0258-7025
年,卷(期):2024.51(13)