首页|不同碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石逃逸和肾功能的影响

不同碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石逃逸和肾功能的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石逃逸、肾功能的影响,拟为临床术式的选择提供数据支持.方法 回顾性分析2016年10月至2021年1月,上尿路结石患者90例的临床资料,根据治疗术式的不同分为两组,分别为输尿管软镜碎石术(flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy,FURL)组(n=40),激光碎石功率9~15 W;微通道经皮肾镜碎石术(mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy,MPCNL)组(n=50),激光碎石功率 10~20 W.FURL组采取FURL治疗,MPCNL组采取MPCNL治疗.记录两组患者碎石功率、手术时长、术中结石逃逸情况和住院时间.术前和术后1 d检测血红蛋白和肾功能指标包括血肌酐(serum creatinine,Scr)、尿素氮(blood urea nitrogen,BUN)水平.术后1周和术后2个月检测患者结石清除情况及并发症.结果 FURL组和MPCNL组术中结石逃逸分别为7.5%、4.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).FURL组术后1周结石清除率较MPCNL组低(P<0.05);两组术后2个月结石清除率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).FURL组手术时间长于MPCNL组,住院时间短于对照组,术后血红蛋白下降值低于MPCNL组(P<0.05);FURL组术后1 d血清Scr、BUN水平低于MPCNL组(P<0.05).FURL组和MPCNL组术后并发症发生率分别为10.0%、20.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 FURL、MPCNL均是治疗上尿路结石的有效术式,且两种术式的结石逃逸现象无明显差异,但FURL对机体损伤更小,能降低对肾功能的影响,术后恢复快、住院时间短.
Impact of Various Lithotripsy Techniques on Stone Escape and Renal Functions in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Stones
Objective To explore the impact of different lithotripsy techniques on stone escape and renal functions in patients with upper urinary tract stones for the sake of providing data support for the clinical selection of surgical procedures.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 90 patients with upper urinary tract stones treated between Oct.2016 and Jan.2021.These patients were categorized into two groups by types of treatment procedure:a flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL)group(n=40)and a mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL)group(n=50).While the patients in the FURL group being given FURL treatment,those in the MPCNL group experienced the MPCNL treatment.The power of lithotripsy,operation duration,stone escape during the operation and hospitalization time for the patients of each group were recorded.The preoperative and 1-day postoperative hemoglobin and renal function indicators,including serum creatinine(Scr)and blood urea nitrogen(BUN)levels,were measured respectively.The stone clearance and complications were detected one week and two months after the surgery respectively.Results The stone escape rate during the operation in the FURL group and the MPCNL group was 7.50%and 4.00%respectively,and the difference between two groups was not significant(P>0.05).The stone clearance rate in the FURL group was lower than that in the MPCNL group one week after the surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups 2 months after the surgery(P>0.05).The operation time in the FURL group was longer than that in the MPCNL group,the hospitalization time shorter than that in the control group,and the postoperative hemoglobin decrease lower than that in the MPCNL group(P<0.05).The levels of Scr and BUN in the FURL group were lower than those in the MPCNL group 1 day after the surgery(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the FURL group and the MPCNL group was 10.0%and 20.0%respectively,and the difference was not significant(P>0.05).Conclusions Both FURL and MPCNL are effective surgical procedures for treating upper urinary tract stones,and there is no significant difference in stone escape between the two procedures.However,FURL will cause less body damage,reduce the impact on renal functions and result in faster postoperative recovery and shorter hospitalization time.

Flexible ureteroscope lithotripsyUpper urinary tract stonesMicrochannel percutaneous nephrolithotomyCom-plicationsRenal functions

刘国政

展开 >

芜湖市中医医院泌尿外科(芜湖市,241000)

输尿管软镜碎石术 上尿路结石 微通道经皮肾镜碎石术 并发症 肾功能

安徽省卫生厅医药科研计划项目

12925KJ2017B26

2024

中国激光医学杂志
中国光学学会

中国激光医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.677
ISSN:1003-9430
年,卷(期):2024.33(5)