首页|剖宫产术静脉泵注右美托咪啶辅助腰硬联合麻醉效果及术后康复质量

剖宫产术静脉泵注右美托咪啶辅助腰硬联合麻醉效果及术后康复质量

扫码查看
目的:探索静脉泵注右美托咪啶对腰硬联合麻醉下剖宫产麻醉效果和术后康复治疗的影响.方法:选取2021年1月-2023年12月本院拟行剖宫产手术产妇94例,随机分为对照组(n=47)和观察组(n=47).两组术中均采用腰硬联合麻醉,观察组于胎儿娩出后给予0.5~1μg/kg右美托咪啶静脉泵注至术毕,对照组静脉滴注等量0.9%氯化钠注射液.术后两组均给予静脉自控镇痛,观察组使用的镇痛泵药物右美托咪啶2.0μg/kg+舒芬太尼2.0μg/kg+阿扎司琼0.3mg/kg加入0.9%氯化钠溶液至100ml泵中,对照组使用的镇痛泵药物舒芬太尼2.0μg/kg+阿扎司琼0.3mg/kg加入0.9%氯化钠溶液至100ml泵中.对比两组围术期血流动力学指标、麻醉效果、术后疼痛(VAS)评分以及术后镇静情况(Ramsay)评分,采用术后恢复质量评分量表(QoR-40)、术后下地活动时间及产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评价产妇术后康复质量.结果:两组术毕即刻平均动脉压、心率及血氧饱和度低于泵入右美托咪啶前但观察组高于对照组;观察组术后12h、24h VAS评分(2.70±1.04分、1.28±0.83分)低于对照组(3.32±1.16分、2.62±0.87分),术后2h、12h Ramsay 评分(1.83±0.48 分、2.30±0.55 分)高于对照组(1.60±0.50 分、1.94±0.49 分),术后 24h、48h QoR-40得分(125.13±10.70分、138.70±10.26分)高于对照组(112.17±20.06分、128.85±10.17分),且下地开始活动时间(8.38±0.53h)短于对照组(12.04±1.04h);产后4周、6周EPDS得分(5.32±1.08分、4.87±0.99分)均低于对照组(6.21±1.08分、5.28±0.90分)(均P<0.05).结论:右美托咪啶辅助腰硬联合麻醉可有效提高剖宫产术中麻醉效果,提升产妇术后康复质量.
Anesthesia effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine assisting the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia of women during cesar-ean section and its influence on the postoperative rehabilitation
Objective:To investigate the anesthesia effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine assisting the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia of women during cesarean section,and to study its influence on the postoperative rehabilitation of the women.Methods:From January 2021 to December 2023,94 pregnant women who wanted cesarean section were selected and were randomly divided into control group(n=47)and observation group(n=47).The women in the two groups were given the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia during cesarean section.The women in the observation group were given intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5-1 μg/kg after the fetal delivery until the end of the operation,and the women in the control group were given intravenous infusion of the same amount of 0.9%so-dium chloride injection during the same period.The patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was given to the women in both groups,including dexmedetomidine 2.0 μg/kg,sufentanil 2.0 μg/kg combined with azasetron 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml 0.9%sodium chloride solution for the women in the observation group,and sufentanil 2.0 μg/kg combined with azase-tron 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml 0.9%sodium chloride solution for the women in the control group.The values of the perioperative hemodynamic parameters,the anesthetic effect,the postoperative pain score by VAS and the postopera-tive sedation score by Ramsay of the women were compared between the two groups.The postoperative rehabilitation quality of the women in the two groups evaluated by the postoperative recovery quality scale(QoR-40),the postopera-tive off-bed activity time evaluated by the postpartum depression scale(EPDS).Results:The values of the mean arte-rial pressure,heart rate and oxygen saturation of the women in the two groups immediately after operation were signif-icantly lower than those before pumping dexmedetomidine,but which of the women in the observation group were sig-nificantly higher than those of the women in the control group.The VAS score of the women in the observation group at 12h or 24h after operation(2.70±1.04 points or 1.28±0.83 points)was significantly lower than that(3.32±1.16 points or 2.62±0.87 points)of the women in the control group.The Ramsay scores of the women in the observation group at 2h or 12h after operation(1.83±0.48 points or 2.30±0.55 points)was significantly higher than that(1.60± 0.50 points or 1.94±0.49 points)of the women in the control group.The QoR-40 scores of the women in the observa-tion group at 24h or 48h after operation(125.13±10.70 points or 138.70±10.26 points)was significantly higher than that(112.17±20.06 points or 128.85±10.17 points)of the women in the control group.The time of getting up(8.38 ±0.53h)of the women in the observation group was significantly shorter than that(12.04±1.04h)of the women in the control group.The EPDS scores of the women in the observation group in the 4th weeks and 6th weeks after deliv-ery(5.32±1.08 points and 4.87±0.99 points)were significantly lower than those(6.21±1.08 points and 5.28±0.90 points)of the women in the control group(all P<0.05).Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine assisting the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia of the women can effectively improve the effect of anesthesia during their cesarean section and im-prove the quality of their postoperative rehabilitation.

Cesarean sectionDexmedetomidineCombined spinal-epidural anesthesiaAnesthetic effectPostopera-tive rehabilitation

段宗祥、于乐涛、李占兵

展开 >

安徽理工大学第一附属医院(淮南,232007)

剖宫产术 右美托咪啶 腰硬联合麻醉 麻醉效果 术后康复

2024

中国计划生育学杂志
国家人口计生委科学技术研究所

中国计划生育学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.759
ISSN:1004-8189
年,卷(期):2024.32(4)
  • 19