首页|居家训练联合骶神经磁刺激及盆底肌康复训练对慢性盆腔痛患者长期疗效观察

居家训练联合骶神经磁刺激及盆底肌康复训练对慢性盆腔痛患者长期疗效观察

扫码查看
目的:探究居家训练联合骶神经磁刺激及盆底肌康复训练对慢性盆腔痛疗效.方法:选取本院2022年6月-2023年6月收治的慢性盆腔痛100例患者分为两组(随机数字表法)各50例,对照组中途脱落10例,共计纳入40例;两组均采用骶神经磁刺激及盆底肌康复训练干预,观察组出院后居家训练,两组均随访6个月.比较两组治疗效果、盆底肌肌力、盆底肌压痛、盆底表面肌电Glazer评估情况以及不良反应.结果:观察组治疗后临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)评分(3.05±0.69分)高于对照组(2.12±0.57分),两组治疗后盆底肌肌力均提升,观察组Laycock改良牛津肌力分级法(MOS)分级优于对照组,两组治疗后视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分均下降且观察组(2.84±1.06分)低于对照组(3.65±1.44分);两组治疗后快速收缩放松时间、前静息平均肌电值与后静息平均肌电值均减少,且观察组(3.24±1.06 s、4.83±1.45μV、4.15±0.81μV)低于对照组(4.01±1.12 s、5.66±1.61μV、4.81±0.95μV)(均 P<0.05);两组治疗期间均未出现明显不良反应;随访期间复发率观察组(1例,2.0%)与对照组(4例,10.0%)无差异(Fisher精确概率=0.167).结论:慢性盆腔痛患者采用居家训练联合骶神经磁刺激及盆底肌康复训练治疗效果良好,患者盆底肌肌力与盆底表面肌电情况得到显著改善,疼痛得到缓解且安全性较高.
Long-term therapeutic efficacy observation of the home-based training combined with sacral nerve magnetic stimulation and pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training for treating patients with chronic pelvic pain
Objective:To explore the long-term therapeutic efficacy of the home-based training combined with sacral nerve magnetic stimulation(SNMS)and pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training(PFMRT)for treating patients with chronic pelvic pain(CPP).Methods:From June 2022 to June 2023,100 patients with CPP were selected and were di-vided into two groups(50 cases in each group)by random number table method.10 patients in the control group had dropped out,so finally,40 patients were included in the control group for analysis.The patients in the two groups re-ceived SNMS and PFMRT,and the patients in the observation group received home-based training additionally.The patients in the two groups were followed up for 6 months.The therapeutic effect,the pelvic floor muscle(PFM)strength,the situations of PFM tenderness and evaluation by Glazer surface electromyographic evaluation of pelvic floor,and the adverse reactions of the patients were compared between the groups.Results:The score(3.05±0.69 points)of the clinical global impression of improvement(CGI-I)of the patients in the observation group after treat-ment was significantly higher than that(2.12±0.57 points)of the patients in the control group.The PFM strength of the patients in the two groups after treatment had increased significantly.The grade by Laycock modified Oxford mus-cle strength classification(MOS)of the patients in the observation group was significantly better than that of the pa-tients in the control group.The visual analogue scale(VAS)score of the patients in the two groups after treatment had decreased significantly,and which(2.84±1.06 points)of the patients in the observation group was significantly lower than that(3.65±1.44 points)of the patients in the control group.The values of the rapid contraction relaxation time,the average pre-resting electromyography and the average post-resting electromyography of the patients in the two groups after treatment had decreased significantly,and which(3.24±1.06 s,4.83±1.45μV and 4.15±0.81μV)of the patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those(4.01±1.12 s,5.66±1.61μV and 4.81±0.95μV)of the patients in the control group(all P<0.05).There was no any patient with obvious adverse reactions in the two groups during treatment.During the follow-up period,there was no significant difference in the CPP recurrence rate(1 case,2.0%vs.4 cases,10.0%)of the patients between the two groups(Fisher's exact probability=0.167).Conclu-sion:Home-based training combined with SNMS and PFMRT for treating the patients with CPP has good effective-ness,which can improve their pelvic floor muscle strength and surface electromyography result,and can relieve their pain,and with the higher safety.

Chronic pelvic painSacral nerve magnetic stimulationHome-based trainingPelvic floor muscle rehabili-tation trainingTherapeutic effect

徐丽霞、苏爱芳、朱玲、胡清月

展开 >

浙江省金华市妇幼保健院(321000)

慢性盆腔痛 骶神经磁刺激 居家训练 盆底肌康复训练 疗效

浙江省金华市科技计划项目

2022-3-127

2024

中国计划生育学杂志
国家人口计生委科学技术研究所

中国计划生育学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.759
ISSN:1004-8189
年,卷(期):2024.32(6)
  • 11