首页|无痛人工流产术丙泊酚复合地佐辛或瑞马唑仑的麻醉效果及对血清S100β、IL-6水平影响

无痛人工流产术丙泊酚复合地佐辛或瑞马唑仑的麻醉效果及对血清S100β、IL-6水平影响

扫码查看
目的:比较丙泊酚复合地佐辛或瑞马唑仑用于无痛人工流产术的麻醉效果及对血清中枢神经特异蛋白(S100β)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平影响.方法:选取2021年6月-2023年12月于本院自愿行无痛人工流产术女性90例,随机数字表分两组,术中丙泊酚分别复合瑞马唑仑(瑞马唑仑组)或地佐辛(地佐辛组)麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果及血清S100β、IL-6水平变化.结果:地佐辛组镇痛效果优于瑞马唑仑组,术中血氧饱和度(98.25±3.13)%、心率(77.71±7.98次/min)、呼吸频率(17.26±1.76次/min)、平均动脉压(79.66±3.82 mmHg)均高于瑞马唑仑组(95.51%±3.10%、70.46±7.12 次/min、15.13±1.53 次/min、76.37±3.89 mmHg),术后疼痛 NRS 评分(2.05±0.54 分)低于瑞马唑仑组(3.10±0.62分),术中丙泊酚用量(112.16±13.34 mg)少于瑞马唑仑组(181.95±20.12 mg),术后24h血清S100β(1.07±0.34μg/ml)、IL-6(22.94±6.49)水平均低于瑞马唑仑组(1.52±0.47μg/ml、32.62±8.02 ng/L),不良反应发生率(4.4%)低于瑞马唑仑组(17.8%)(均P<0.05).结论:无痛人工流产术,与瑞马唑仑相比,采用地佐辛复合丙泊酚麻醉效果更好,可减轻受术者手术疼痛的同时,亦降低了不良反应发生概率,减轻认知功能损伤.
Anesthetic effect of the dizosin or remimazolam combined with propofol for the painless abortion of women and their influ-ence on the serum central nervous system specific protein and interleukin-6 levels
Objective:To compare the effect of the dizosin and remimazolam combined with propofol for the painless a-bortion of women,and to study their influence on the serum central nervous system specific protein(S100β)and inter-leukin-6 levels(IL-6)of the women.Methods:90 women who wanted painless abortion voluntarily were selected as the study subjects and were randomly divided into two groups by random number table from June 2021 to December 2023.The women in group A were given remimazolam combined with propofol for the painless abortion,and the women in group B were given dizosin combined with propofol for the painless abortion.The anesthesia effects and the changes of the serum S100β and IL-6 levels of the women were compared between the two groups.Results:The anal-gesic effect of the women in group B was significantly better than that of the women in group A.The intraoperative blood oxygen saturation(98.25±3.13)%,the heart rate(77.71±7.98 times/min),the respiratory rate(17.26±1.76 times/min)and the mean arterial pressure(79.66±3.82 mmHg)of the women in group B were significantly higher than those(95.51%±3.10%,70.46±7.12 times/min,15.13±1.53 times/min and 76.37±3.89 mmHg)of the women in group A.The NRS score of the postoperative pain(2.05±0.54 points)of the women in group B was significantly lower than that(3.10±0.62 points)of the women in group A.The dosage of propofol(112.16±13.34 mg)of the women in group B was significantly less than that(181.95±20.12 mg)of the women in group A.The levels of the serum S100β(1.07±0.34 mu g/ml)and IL-6(22.94±6.49)of the women in 24h after abortion of the women in group B were significantly lower than those(1.52±0.47μg/ml and 32.62±8.02 ng/L)of the women in group A.The inci-dence of adverse reactions(4.4%)of the women in group B was significantly lower than that(17.8%)of the women in group A(all P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with those of remimazolam combined with propofol for the painless a-bortion of the women,the dizosin combined with propofol for the painless abortion of the women has the better anes-thesia effect,which can not only alleviate the surgical pain of the women,but also can decrease the probability of their adverse reactions and alleviate their cognitive impairment.

Painless induced abortionDizosinRemimazolamPropofolCentral nervous system specific proteinIn-terleukin-6Anesthetic effectAdverse reaction

叶佳佳、叶晶晶

展开 >

浙江中医药大学附属江南医院,杭州市萧山区中医院(311200)

恩泽医疗中心(集团)恩泽医院

无痛人工流产术 地佐辛 瑞马唑仑 丙泊酚 中枢神经特异蛋白 白细胞介素-6 麻醉效果 不良反应

2024

中国计划生育学杂志
国家人口计生委科学技术研究所

中国计划生育学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.759
ISSN:1004-8189
年,卷(期):2024.32(10)