首页|不同频率重复经颅磁刺激对帕金森病患者构音障碍的疗效

不同频率重复经颅磁刺激对帕金森病患者构音障碍的疗效

扫码查看
目的:观察不同频率重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合构音训练对帕金森病(PD)患者构音障碍的疗效.方法:将64例PD构音障碍患者随机分为常规组、高频组、低频组、假刺激组,每组16例.常规组接受常规治疗,包括药物治疗和常规构音训练;高频组、低频组、假刺激组在常规组治疗的基础上,采用不同频率rTMS联合构音训练,高频组采用5Hz rTMS刺激双侧口面部初级感觉运动区(OF-SM1),低频组采用1Hz rTMS刺激双侧OF-SM1,假刺激组采用无磁场输出rTMS刺激双侧OF-SM1,治疗30d.分别于治疗前后、随访时,采用Frenchay构音障碍评分量表、声嘶听感知评定量表(GRBAS)、嗓音障碍指数(VHI)问卷、交流有效性指数(CETI)量表、幅度标准差、连续语音能力言语速率、言语基频标准差(F0SD)、最长声时(MPT)、最大数数能力(MCA)、接触率微扰(CQP)、声门噪音(NNE)、/i/的第2共振峰(F2/i/)、平均强度评估,比较4组患者在构音器官运动功能、嗓音嘶哑程度和自我主观感受、语言交流能力、言语节律、语速、语调、呼吸支持、呼吸与发声协调性、声门闭合的规律性、气息声、口腔共鸣、音量的疗效差异.结果:与治疗前比较,4组患者治疗后Frenchay评分、幅度标准差、F0SD、连续语音能力言语速率MPT、MCA、平均强度、F2/i/、CETI评分均明显提高(P<0.05),CQP、NNE、GRBAS、VHI评分均明显降低(P<0.05).与治疗前比较,4组患者随访时幅度标准差、F0SD、连续语音能力言语速率、MPT、MCA、平均强度、F2/i/、CETI评分均明显提高(P<0.05),NNE、GRBAS评分、VHI评分均明显降低(P<0.05),高频组随访时的CQP明显降低(P<0.05),高频组、低频组随访时的Frenchay评分均明显提高(P<0.05).高频组治疗后和随访时的Frenchay评分、幅度标准差、F0SD、连续语音能力言语速率、MPT、MCA、平均强度、F2/i/、CETI评分均显著高于其他组(P<0.05),CQP、NNE、GRBAS、VHI评分均显著低于其他组(P<0.05).结论:高频rTMS联合常规构音训练能提高PD患者的构音运动、呼吸支持、呼吸与发声的协调性、声门闭合的规律性、音量、口腔共鸣、日常语言交流能力;减轻气息声、嗓音嘶哑和自我主观感受;改善语调单一、响度单一、发音拖延及停顿,其疗效优于常规构音训练和低频rTMS,且具有一定的远期疗效,值得临床推广.
Effect of different frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dysarthria in patients with Parkinson's dis-ease
Objective:To observe the therapeutic effect of different frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stim-ulation(rTMS)combined with articulation training on dysarthria in patients with Parkinson's disease(PD).Meth-od:A total of 64 patients with PD articulation disorders were randomly divided into a control group,a high-frequen-cy group,a low-frequency group,and a sham stimulation group,with 16 cases in each group.The control group re-ceived 40 min of articulation training.The high-frequency group was treated with 5 Hz rTMS stimulation of the both of primary sensory motor area(OF-SM1)on both sides of the mouth and face for 20 min combined with articulation training for 40 min on the basis of the conventional group.The low-frequency group received 1Hz rTMS stimulation of the OF-SM1 area on both sides for 20 min combined with articulation training for 40 min on the basis of the con-ventional group.The sham stimulation group received rTMS stimulation of the OF-SM1 area on both sides(without magnetic field output)for 20 min combined with articulation training for 40 min on the basis of the conventional group,once a day,for a total of 30 days of treatment.Before treatment,immediately after treatment(30 days after treatment),and during follow-up(30 days after treatment),the frenchay dysarthria rating scale,hoarseness rat-ing scale(GRBAS),The voice handicap index(VHI),The communication effectiveness index(CETI)scale,amplitude standard deviation,continuous speech ability speech rate,speech fundamental frequency standard de-viation(F0SD),maximum phonation time(MPT),maximum counting ability(cMCA),contact quotient perturbation(CQP),normalized noise energy(NNE),second formant(F2/i/)and average intensity assessment were used to compare the therapeutic differences in articu-latory organ motor function,voice hoarseness degree and self-subjective perception,verbal communication ability,speech rhythm,speech speed,intonation,respiratory support,respiration and vocal coordination,glottic closure regularity,breath sound,oral resonance,and volume among 4 groups.Results:Compared to those before treat-ment,frenchay scores,amplitude standard deviation,mean intensity,F0SD,MPT,cMCA,mean intensity,F2/i/and CETI scores in the 4 groups were significantly increased after treatment(P<0.05),while CQP,NNE,CQP,GRBAS scores and VHI scores were significantly decreased(P<0.05).After treatment,the speech rate of contin-uous speech ability in high frequency group and low frequency group was significantly increased(P<0.05).Com-pared with those before treatment,amplitude standard deviation,mean intensity,F2/i/and CETI scores in the 4 groups were significantly increased during follow-up(P<0.05),while NNE,GRBAS and VHI scores were signifi-cantly decreased during follow-up(P<0.05).CQP in high frequency group was significantly decreased during fol-low-up(P<0.05).The frenchay scores,F0SD,the speech rate of continuous speech ability,MPT and cMCA in high frequency group and low frequency group were significantly increased during follow-up(P<0.05).The fren-chay scores,amplitude standard deviation,F0SD,the speech rate of continuous speech ability,MPT,cMCA,mean intensity,F2/i/and CETI scores in high frequency group were significantly higher than those in other groups after treatment and at follow-up(P<0.05).CQP,NNE,GRBAS and VHI scores were significantly lower than those of other groups after treatment and at follow-up(P<0.05).Conclusion:High frequency rTMS combined conventional articulation training can improve the articulation movement,respiratory support ability,the coordination ability of breathing and vocalization,the regularity of glottis closure,volume,oral resonance and language communication a-bility in PD patients,reduce breathing sound,hoarseness and self-subjective feelings of voice disorder,and improve monotonous intonation,mono-loudness,pronunciation delay and pause.Its efficacy is superior to conventional artic-ulation training and low frequency rTMS,and has a certain long-term effect,which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Parkinson's diseasedysarthriahigh frequencylow frequencyrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationarticulation trainingvoice training

王晓雯、袁海新、赵刚、钱红

展开 >

上海市第五康复医院康复医学科,上海 201699

上海市第五康复医院老年内科,上海 201699

帕金森病 构音障碍 高频 低频 重复经颅磁刺激 构音训练 嗓音训练

2024

中国康复
中国残疾人康复协会 华中科技大学同济医学院

中国康复

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.154
ISSN:1001-2001
年,卷(期):2024.39(12)