首页|国家自然科学基金面上项目的遴选标准及其规范化探讨

国家自然科学基金面上项目的遴选标准及其规范化探讨

扫码查看
同行评议的决策机制中,获取同行专家提供的评议意见很重要,管理者如何基于评议意见做出科学决策也同样不可忽视.国家自然科学基金项目管理者面对大量的项目,且每个项目包含有多个同行专家的评议意见,如何汇总项目的评议意见并从众多项目中优中选优开展项目遴选,倘若没有科学且可把握的遴选标准,遴选过程的不规范、不科学必然事实上将对获取的同行专家评议意见打折扣.因此,建立科学、规范的项目遴选标准,减少遴选过程中可能存在的随意性,避免其中人为因素干扰,是确保同行评议制度公正性的重要环节.
The Studies on the Criterion for Selecting Grants Based on Peer Review of General Proposals Received by National Natural Science Foundation of China
Although comments from reviewers are very important in peer review,how to select grants for funding based on reviewers'comments is also indispensable.As making a decision for funding of one proposal,a grant manager needs the help of an appreciable criterion,which is a indicator of reflecting the quality of proposals,in order to pick out grants fairly and conveniently from evaluated proposals.The criterion is a prerequisite for summarizing scientifically comments from different reviewers for one proposal,which help managers to rule out the possibility of unfairness in selecting grants.The quantitative criterion should be a good choice for selecting grants for funding from many evaluated proposals.

peer reviewproposals received by NSFCcriterion for selecting grants

江虎军、王蕊、孙琳、高霏

展开 >

国家自然科学基金委员会医学科学部,北京 100085

同行评议 基金项目 遴选标准

2024

中国科学基金
国家自然科学基金委员会

中国科学基金

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.62
ISSN:1000-8217
年,卷(期):2024.38(4)