矿业科学技术学报(英文版)2024,Vol.34Issue(4) :531-543.DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.04.005

Comparative analysis of thermodynamic and mechanical responses between underground hydrogen storage and compressed air energy storage in lined rock caverns

Bowen Hu Liyuan Yu Xianzhen Mi Fei Xu Shuchen Li Wei Li Chao Wei Tao Zhang
矿业科学技术学报(英文版)2024,Vol.34Issue(4) :531-543.DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.04.005

Comparative analysis of thermodynamic and mechanical responses between underground hydrogen storage and compressed air energy storage in lined rock caverns

Bowen Hu 1Liyuan Yu 1Xianzhen Mi 1Fei Xu 2Shuchen Li 3Wei Li 1Chao Wei 1Tao Zhang1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China;Key Laboratory of Large Structure Health Monitoring and Control,Shijiazhuang Tiedao University,Shijiazhuang 050043,China
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China;School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China
  • 折叠

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage(UHS)and compressed air energy storage(CAES)are two viable large-scale energy storage technologies for mitigating the intermittency of wind and solar power.Therefore,it is meaningful to compare the properties of hydrogen and air with typical thermodynamic storage pro-cesses.This study employs a multi-physical coupling model to compare the operations of CAES and UHS,integrating gas thermodynamics within caverns,thermal conduction,and mechanical deformation around rock caverns.Gas thermodynamic responses are validated using additional simulations and the field test data.Temperature and pressure variations of air and hydrogen within rock caverns exhibit sim-ilarities under both adiabatic and diabatic simulation modes.Hydrogen reaches higher temperature and pressure following gas charging stage compared to air,and the ideal gas assumption may lead to overes-timation of gas temperature and pressure.Unlike steel lining of CAES,the sealing layer(fibre-reinforced plastic FRP)in UHS is prone to deformation but can effectively mitigates stress in the sealing layer.In CAES,the first principal stress on the surface of the sealing layer and concrete lining is tensile stress,whereas UHS exhibits compressive stress in the same areas.Our present research can provide references for the selection of energy storage methods.

Key words

Underground hydrogen storage/Compressed air energy storage/Mechanical response/Thermodynamic response/Lined rock caverns

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家自然科学基金(52179118)

国家自然科学基金(52209151)

国家自然科学基金(42307238)

Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Science and Technology-Carbon Emissions Peak and Carbon N(BK20220025)

Excellent Postdoctoral Program of Jiangsu Province(2023ZB602)

中国博士后科学基金(2023M733773)

中国博士后科学基金(2023M733772)

Xuzhou City Science and Technology Innovation Special Basic Research Plan(KC23045)

State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering,China Uni(SKLGDUEK1916)

出版年

2024
矿业科学技术学报(英文版)
中国矿业大学

矿业科学技术学报(英文版)

CSTPCDCSCDEI
影响因子:1.222
ISSN:2095-2686
参考文献量44
段落导航相关论文