首页|差异源储结构下储层发育机制及其对油气富集的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区长71-2段为例

差异源储结构下储层发育机制及其对油气富集的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区长71-2段为例

Reservoir development mechanism and its influence on oil and gas under differential source and reservoir structure:A case study from Chang 71-2 tight sandstone of Qingcheng area,Ordos Basin

扫码查看
鄂尔多斯盆地长71-2段储层非均质性强及其差异形成机制认识不清成为制约油气富集的关键问题.结合测井、录井、岩心观察和高压压汞、X全岩衍射等分析测试,并以砂地比和砂-泥单层厚度为标准将研究区长71-2段划分出储夹源型、源储互层型和源夹储型等3类9种源储结构.结果表明:储夹源型中储层的物性普遍更好,表现出原生粒间孔和次生孔隙较多、分选性好和排替压力低的特征;源夹储型中储层的物性较差,表现为孔隙含量较少且排替压力大;而源储互层型中储层质量则介于两者之间.储层差异的形成受洪水型重力流沉积、胶结作用和近源有机酸溶蚀的控制.在强水动力洪水型重力流下形成的湖底扇、水道、席状砂中发育较多厚层(>5 m)的源储结构储层,因分选好和刚性颗粒多而具有较强抗压实能力,从而保留了更多的原生孔隙.反之,半深湖、深湖中发育较多薄层的(<2 m)的源储结构储层,因岩石成分中塑性颗粒较多且分选差,导致在压实作用下原生孔隙大量减少.研究区的胶结作用主要是钙质、硅质、泥质胶结3种类型,储夹源型中储层因钙质、泥质等胶结物含量较少,绿泥石含量较多且以薄膜形态覆盖在岩石颗粒表面,抑制了硅质胶结,从而胶结程度较低,使储层中原生孔隙保存较好;而钙质等胶结物含量较多的源夹储型中的储层则表现出较强的胶结作用,使原生孔隙破坏严重.近源有机酸对孔隙的发育有着建设性的作用,其中岩石粒度较大的厚层的储层可提供有利溶蚀通道而形成较多次生孔隙;极细粒砂岩发育较多的薄层的储层通常阻碍溶蚀作用,导致次生孔隙不易形成.最终通过油井数占比和含油饱和度分析表明,储夹源型、源储互层型和源夹储型中的储层的含油性依次降低,对应的二级源储结构下的储层中厚储夹中源型、厚源厚储互层型和厚储夹薄源型的储层含油性最好.
The strong reservoir heterogeneity and unclear understanding of formation mechanism of Chang71-2 member in Ordos Basin is a key issue that constrains hydrocarbon enrichment.Based on the logging,core observation,high pressure mercury injection,X diffraction analysis and other analysis tests,and further combined with sandstone percentage and sand-mud single layer thickness as the standard,the Chang 71-2 member of the study area was divided into three categories and corresponding nine sub-types of source-reservoir structures,including reservoir sandwiching source type,source sandwiching reservoir type and source-reservoir interbedding type.The results show that the reservoir in the reservoir sandwiching source type is generally better in physical property,showing more primary intergranular pores and secondary pores,good sorting and low displacement pressure.The physical properties of source sandwiching reservoir are poor,which are characterized by less pore con-tent and large displacement pressure.The reservoir quality of source-reservoir interbedding is between the two source-reservoir structures mentioned above.The formation of reservoir differences is con-trolled by flood gravity flow deposition,cementation and near-source organic acid dissolution.The source-reservoir structure reservoir with more thick layers(>5 m)developed in the subracustrine fan,channel and sheet sand formed by strong hydrodynamic flood gravity flow has stronger anti-com-paction ability due to good sorting and more rigid particles,thus retaining more primary pores.On the contrary,the source-reservoir structure reservoirs with more thin layers(<2 m)in semi-deep lakes and deep lakes,due to the large number of plastic particles in the rock composition and poor sorting,leads to a large reduction of primary pores under the action of compaction.The cementation in the study area is mainly composed of calcareous,siliceous and argillaceous cements.In the reservoir sand-wiching source type,the content of calcareous and argillaceous cements is less,and chlorite is more in the form of thin film covering the surface of rock particles,which inhibits siliceous cementation,re-sulting in a lower degree of cementation and better preservation of primary pores in the reservoir.However,the reservoir with more calcium and other cement content in the source sandwiching reser-voir type shows strong cementation,which leads to serious destruction of primary pores.Near-source organic acids play a constructive role in the development of pores,and the thick reservoir with large rock grain size can provide favorable dissolution channels and form more secondary pores.The thin layer reservoir with more development of very fine grained sandstone usually hinders dissolution and makes it difficult to form secondary pores.Finally,through the analysis of the oil-show well ratio and the oil saturation,it is shown that the oil content of the reservoir sandwiching source type,the source-reservoir interbedding type and the source sandwiching reservoir type decreases successively.Mean-while,the oil content of the reservoir in the corresponding sub-types shows that thick reservoir sand-wiching medium-thickness source,thick source thick reservoir interbeding,thick reservoir sandwiching thin source is the best.

source-reservoir structurereservoir differencegenetic mechanismOrdos BasinChang71-2 member of Yanchang Formation

姚东升、陈冬霞、李莎、成铭、王福伟、马勇、鲜本忠

展开 >

中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室 北京 102249

中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院 北京 102249

源储结构 储层差异 成因机制 鄂尔多斯盆地 延长组71-2段

中国石油天然气集团有限公司-中国石油大学(北京)战略合作科技专项

ZLZX2020-02-01-03

2024

中国矿业大学学报
中国矿业大学

中国矿业大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.83
ISSN:1000-1964
年,卷(期):2024.53(2)
  • 47