中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(2) :77-80,85.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.02.001

3D-ASL与SWI技术对ACI患者脑血流灌注的评估价值

Evaluation value of 3D-ASL and SWI for cerebral blood perfusion in ACI patients

何志铿 黄清善 欧阳红斌 马小碧 潘志明
中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(2) :77-80,85.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.02.001

3D-ASL与SWI技术对ACI患者脑血流灌注的评估价值

Evaluation value of 3D-ASL and SWI for cerebral blood perfusion in ACI patients

何志铿 1黄清善 1欧阳红斌 1马小碧 1潘志明1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 佛山复星禅诚医院影像医学科,广东佛山 528000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨三维动脉自旋标记成像(3D-ASL)与磁敏感加权成像(SWI)技术对急性脑梗死(ACI)患者脑血流灌注的评估价值.方法:选取2020年12月—2022年12月本院收治的78例ACI患者,所有患者均行常规磁共振成像、SWI和3D-ASL技术检查,根据MRI检查情况将其分为症状组(n=57)和无症状组(n=21),采用半定量Alberta卒中项目早期CT评分系统(AS-PECTS)对SWI图像中的低信号血管征(PHVS)进行分级,测量3D-ASL技术检测的rCBF值,对比症状组和无症状组ASPECTS评分和rCBF水平.采用神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)对入组ACI患者病情严重进行评估,比较不同严重程度患者ASPECTS评分和rCBF水平,采用Pearson相关性分析ASPECTS评分、rCBF水平与NIHSS评分的关系.结果:无症状组患者ASPECTS评分低于症状组,rCBF水平高于症状组(P<0.05).根据ACI患者的NIHSS评分将其分为轻度组(n=19)、中度组(n=32)和重度组(n=27).轻度组ASPECTS评分低于中度组和重度组,rCBF水平高于中度组和重度组(P<0.05),且相较于中度组,重度组ASPECTS评分更高,rCBF水平更低(P<0.05).Pearson相关性分析显示,NIHSS评分与ASPECTS评分呈正相关(r=0.386),与rCBF呈负相关(r=-0.414)(P均<0.05).结论:两种技术均对病情严重有评估价值,但相较于SWI技术,3D-ASL技术评估ACI患者脑血流灌注的临床价值更高.

Abstract

Objective:To explore the evaluation value of three-dimensional arterial spin labeling imaging(3D-ASL)and susceptibility weighted imaging(SWI)for cerebral blood perfusion in patients with acute cerebral infarction(ACI).Methods:A total of 78 patients with ACI admitted to the hospital were enrolled between December 2020 and December 2022.All under-went routine MRI,SWI and 3D-ASL.According to MRI results,they were divided into symptomatic group(n=57)and asymp-tomatic group(n=21).The prominent hypointense vessels signs(PHVS)in SWI images were graded by semi-quantitative Alberta stroke program early CT score(ASPECTS).The rCBF values were detected by 3D-ASL.ASPECTS and rCBF were compared between the symptomatic group and the asymptomatic group.The disease severity in ACI patients was evaluated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS).ASPECTS and rCBF in patients with different disease severity were compared.The relationship between ASPECTS,rCBF and NIHSS score was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.Results:ASPECTS in the asymptomatic group was lower than that in the symptomatic group,and rCBF was greater than that in the symptomatic group(P<0.05).According to NIHSS scores,ACI patients were divided into mild group(n=19),moderate group(n=32)and severe group(n=27).ASPECTS in mild group was lower than that in moderate and severe groups,while rCBF was greater than that in moderate and severe groups(P<0.05).Compared with moderate group,ASPECTS was higher,and rCBF was lower in severe group(P<0.05).Pearson correlation analysis showed that NIHSS score was positively correlated with ASPECTS(r=0.386),while negatively correlated with rCBF(r=-0.414,P<0.05).Conclusion:Both 3D-ASL and SWI were valuable for disease severity e-valuation.However,compared with SWI,3D-ASL is better for clinical evaluation of cerebral blood perfusion in ACI patients.

关键词

脑梗死/脑血管循环/磁共振成像

Key words

Brain Infarction/Cerebrovascular Circulation/Magnetic Resonance Imaging

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

佛山市科技创新项目自筹经费类科技计划(2020001004610)

出版年

2024
中国临床医学影像杂志
中国医学影像技术研究会,中国医科大学

中国临床医学影像杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.204
ISSN:1008-1062
被引量1
参考文献量17
段落导航相关论文