中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(2) :90-95.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.02.004

合成MRI定量参数区分三阴性与非三阴性乳腺癌的价值

The value of quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI in differentiating triple negative breast cancer from other types

李芹 李方正 于海童 吴莎莎 牛庆亮
中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(2) :90-95.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.02.004

合成MRI定量参数区分三阴性与非三阴性乳腺癌的价值

The value of quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI in differentiating triple negative breast cancer from other types

李芹 1李方正 2于海童 2吴莎莎 1牛庆亮1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 潍坊市中医院影像中心,山东潍坊 261041
  • 2. 潍坊医学院影像学院,山东潍坊 262100
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨合成MRI定量参数区分三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)与非TNBC的价值.方法:回顾性收集经病理证实的186例乳腺病变患者,术前均完成乳腺常规与合成MRI检查.采用ICC和Bland-Altman图分析不同观察者获得合成MRI定量参数的一致性.单、多因素logistic回归分析合成MRI定量参数区分TNBC与非TNBC的价值,并绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),计算曲线下面积(AUC)及敏感度、特异度.结果:基于3D-ROI获得的T1、T2和PD值的一致性ICC3D(0.994、0.996和0.989)优于2D-ROI(0.848、0.850、0.898).T1-均值、T2-均值联合模型区分TNBC与Luminal A型乳腺癌ROC曲线的AUC值为0.79(95%CI:0.65~0.88),敏感度为56.67%,特异度为88.00%.T2-均值区分TNBC与Luminal B型乳腺癌ROC曲线的AUC值为0.74(95%CI:0.64~0.82),敏感度为63.66%,特异度为80.88%.PD-均值区分TNBC与HER2过表达型乳腺癌ROC曲线的AUC值为0.70(95%CI:0.55~0.82),敏感度为80.00%,特异度为55.00%.结论:不同观察者基于3D-ROI获得的合成MRI定量参数的可重复性高于2D-ROI;合成MRI定量参数可以为区分TNBC与非TNBC提供帮助.

Abstract

Objective:To explore the value of quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI in differentiating triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC)from other subtypes.Methods:A total of 186 patients with breast lesions confirmed by pathology were prospectively collected.All patients underwent conventional MRI and synthetic MRI before surgery.ICC and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze the consistency of synthetic MRI quantitative parameters between different observers.The value of quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI in distinguishing TNBC from other types was analyzed by univariate and multivari-ate logistic regression,and the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)was plotted.The area under the curve(AUC),sensi-tivity,and specificity were calculated.Results:ICC3D of T1,T2 and PD based on 3D-ROI(0.994,0.996 and 0.989)were bet-ter than ICC2D based on 2D-ROI(0.848,0.850 and 0.898).The AUC value of the T1-mean and T2-mean combined model for distinguishing TNBC from Luminal A type was 0.79(95%CI:0.65~0.88),with a sensitivity of 56.67%and specificity of 88.00%.The AUC value of the T2-mean ROC curve distinguishing TNBC from Luminal B breast cancer was 0.74(95%CI:0.64~0.82),with a sensitivity of 63.66%and specificity of 80.88%.The AUC value of the PD-mean ROC curve distinguishing TNBC from Luminal B breast cancer was 0.70(95%CI:0.55~0.82),with a sensitivity of 80.00%and specificity of 55.00%.Conclusions:The repeatability of synthetic MRI quantitative parameters based on 3D-ROI was higher than that of 2D-ROI between different observers.Quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI may provide a basis for distinguishing TNBC from oth-er types.

关键词

乳腺肿瘤/磁共振成像

Key words

Breast Neoplasms/Magnetic Resonance Imaging

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR20210306229)

出版年

2024
中国临床医学影像杂志
中国医学影像技术研究会,中国医科大学

中国临床医学影像杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.204
ISSN:1008-1062
参考文献量23
段落导航相关论文