中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(4) :259-262.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.04.008

超声灰阶比值鉴别≤4cm的肾透明细胞癌和肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的价值

The value of ultrasound gray scale ratio in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma(≤4 cm)

王盼 钱佳红 王福建 章彤 胡春锋 魏培英 韩志江
中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(4) :259-262.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.04.008

超声灰阶比值鉴别≤4cm的肾透明细胞癌和肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的价值

The value of ultrasound gray scale ratio in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma(≤4 cm)

王盼 1钱佳红 2王福建 1章彤 2胡春锋 2魏培英 3韩志江3
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 杭州市第九人民医院,浙江 杭州 311225
  • 2. 浙江中医药大学,浙江 杭州 310053
  • 3. 西湖大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院,浙江 杭州 310006
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨超声灰阶比值(UGSR)鉴别≤4 cm的肾透明细胞癌(ccRCC)和肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(RAML)的价值.方法:回顾分析≤4 cm的 101 例ccRCC和 98 例RAML超声影像资料,采用RADinfo系统测量病灶、肾皮质、肾窦的灰阶值,计算c-UGSR(病灶灰阶值/肾皮质灰阶值)和s-UGSR(病灶灰阶值/肾窦灰阶值).构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算c-UGSR、s-UGSR最佳阈值并分析联合诊断的诊断效能.评估两名研究者间UGSR一致性.结果:ccRCC和RAML病灶的c-UGSR分别为 1.170(0.890,1.430)和 1.840(1.458,2.283)(Z=-8.666,P<0.05),s-UGSR分别为 0.680(0.500,0.825)和 1.090(0.878,1.248)(Z=-8.585,P<0.05).c-UGSR、s-UGSR诊断ccRCC的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.856 和 0.852,最佳阈值分别为 1.67 和 0.85,敏感度和特异度分别为 92.1%和 63.3%、80.2%和 78.6%.两者联合诊断ccRCC的AUC为 0.884,敏感度和特异度分别 85.2%和80.6%.与c-UGSR、s-UGSR相比,两者联合诊断效能最大(Z=2.016、2.467,P均<0.05).两名研究者间c-UGSR、s-UGSR一致性较好(ICC=0.810、0.845,P均<0.05).结论:UGSR能更客观、准确评价≤4 cm的ccRCC和RAML,且可重复性较强.

Abstract

Objective:To investigate the value of ultrasound gray scale ratio(UGSR)in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma(ccRCC)and renal angiomyolipoma(RAML)(≤4 cm).Methods:The ultrasound imaging data from 101 cases of ccRCC and 98 cases of RAML(≤4 cm)were retrospectively analyzed.The ultrasound gray scale of the lesions,renal cortex and renal sinus were measured using the RADinfo system with c-UGSR(ultrasound gray scale of lesion/ultrasound gray scale of renal cortex)and s-UGSR(ultrasound gray scale of lesion/ultrasound gray scale of renal sinus)calculated.The optimal thresholds for c-UGSR and s-UGSR were calculated and the diagnostic efficacy of the combined diagnosis was assessed via plotting the re-ceiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.The consistency of UGSR between the two subjects was analyzed by interclass cor-relation coefficient(ICC).Results:The values of c-UGSR were 1.170(0.890,1.430)and 1.840(1.458,2.283)for ccRCC and RAML lesions,respectively(Z=-8.666,P<0.05),and the values of s-UGSR were 0.680(0.500,0.825)and 1.090(0.878,1.248)for ccRCC and RAML lesions,respectively(Z=-8.585,P<0.05).The area under the ROC curve(AUC)by c-UGSR and s-UGSR analysis for ccRCC was 0.856 and 0.852 respectively,with optimal thresholds of 1.67 and 0.85,and the sensitivity and speci-ficity of 92.1%and 63.3%,80.2%and 78.6%,respectively.The AUC of the combined diagnosis by c-UGSR and s-UGSR for ccRCC was 0.884,with sensitivities and specificities of 85.2%and 80.6%,respectively.The combined diagnostic efficacy was superior compared with individual ones(Z=2.016,2.467,both P<0.05).Good consistency was observed between the two subjects for c-UGSR,s-UGSR(ICC=0.810,0.845,both P<0.05).Conclusion:With strong reproducibility,the UGSR can evaluate ccR-CC and RAML(≤4 cm)more objectively and accurately.

关键词

癌,肾细胞/肾肿瘤/超声检查

Key words

Carcinoma,Renal Cell/Kidney Neoplasms/Ultrasonography

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国临床医学影像杂志
中国医学影像技术研究会,中国医科大学

中国临床医学影像杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.204
ISSN:1008-1062
参考文献量16
段落导航相关论文