中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(9) :641-645.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.09.008

多模态影像引导经会阴前列腺靶向活检与系统活检的对比研究

Comparative analysis of transperineal systematic biopsy versus transperineal multimodal imaging targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer

黄志武 蓝中凯 石才够 农有祥 齐鲁 杨剑文 梁国 张步林
中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(9) :641-645.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.09.008

多模态影像引导经会阴前列腺靶向活检与系统活检的对比研究

Comparative analysis of transperineal systematic biopsy versus transperineal multimodal imaging targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer

黄志武 1蓝中凯 1石才够 1农有祥 1齐鲁 1杨剑文 1梁国 1张步林1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广西医科大学附属柳州市人民医院,广西 柳州 545006
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:比较多模态影像引导经会阴(Transperineal,TP)靶向穿刺与TP系统穿刺前列腺癌(Prostate cancer,PCa)的检出率.方法:将 120 例临床疑似PCa患者随机分成系统组 60 例与靶向组 60 例,分别行TP穿刺活检,系统组每例 12 针,靶向组每例 10~14 针.靶向组患者穿刺前行多模态超声或/和多参数MRI(mp-MIR)检查,实施 8+X(系统+可疑病灶)的穿刺策略.比较两组PCa检出率.结果:两组间PCa及无临床意义PCa检出率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而靶向组有临床意义PCa(Clinically significant prostate cancer,csPCa)的检出率高于系统组(χ2=10.497,P=0.038).靶向组中单针穿刺阳性率高于系统组(31.09%vs.23.47%;χ2=10.497,P=0.001).两组间PCa患者Gleason评分分布差异无统计学意义(χ2=8.213,P=0.084).两组患者术后均无严重并发症发生.结论:与TP系统穿刺对比,TP靶向穿刺csPCa的检出率更高,多模态影像在提高csPCa的检出率中具有临床应用价值.

Abstract

Objective:To compare the detection rates of prostate cancer(PCa)between the transperineal(TP)systematic biopsy and TP multimodal imaging targeted biopsy.Methods:A total of 120 clinically suspected PCa patients were randomly divided into a systematic group(n=60)and a targeted group(n=60).TP biopsy was performed separately,with 12 cores per case in the systematic group and 10~13 cores per case in the targeted group.Targeted group patients underwent multimodal ultra-sound or/and multi-parameter MRI(mp-MIR)examination before biopsy,and an 8+X(systematic+suspicious lesion)biopsy strat-egy was implemented.The detection rates of PCa between two groups were compared.Results:There were no statistically sig-nificant differences in the detection rates of PCa and non clinically significant PCa between the two groups(P>0.05),while the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa)in the targeted group was higher than that in the system group(χ2=10.497,P=0.038).The positive rate of single core for prostate cancer in the targeted group was higher than that in the systematic group(31.09%vs.23.47%;χ2=10.497,P=0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in Gleason score distribution between the two groups of PCa patients(χ2=8.213,P=0.084).Both groups of patients had no serious postoperative complications.Conclusions:Compared with systematic TP biospy,targeted TP biopsy has a higher detection rate of csPCa,and multimodal imaging has clinical application value in improving the detection of csPCa.

关键词

前列腺肿瘤/超声检查,介入性/磁共振成像

Key words

Prostatic Neoplasms/Ultrasonography,Interventional/Magnetic Resonance Imaging

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

广西卫生健康委员会自筹项目(Z20212023)

出版年

2024
中国临床医学影像杂志
中国医学影像技术研究会,中国医科大学

中国临床医学影像杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.204
ISSN:1008-1062
参考文献量2
段落导航相关论文