中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(9) :665-668.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.09.013

剪切波弹性成像技术评估针灸及核心稳定训练治疗非特异性下腰痛疗效的研究

Study on the efficacy of shear wave elastography in evaluating acupuncture and core stability training for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain

沈燕 王君 张婷婷 李绍康 胡卿 傅晓红
中国临床医学影像杂志2024,Vol.35Issue(9) :665-668.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2024.09.013

剪切波弹性成像技术评估针灸及核心稳定训练治疗非特异性下腰痛疗效的研究

Study on the efficacy of shear wave elastography in evaluating acupuncture and core stability training for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain

沈燕 1王君 1张婷婷 1李绍康 1胡卿 1傅晓红1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海市浦东新区公利医院,上海 200135
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨剪切波弹性成像(SWE)技术评估针灸及核心稳定训练治疗非特异性下腰痛(NLBP)疗效的应用价值.方法:选择 2022 年 1 月—2023 年 12 月我院收治的NLBP患者 140 例及健康志愿者 70 例,比较NLBP患者与健康志愿者腰大肌的剪切波弹性速度(SWV)值.NLBP患者采用单盲法按照 1∶1 比例随机分为两组,治疗组行针灸治疗,对照组行腰背肌核心稳定性训练,均接受 2 个疗程治疗.疗程结束后,比较两组治疗前后的SWV值、VAS评分、JOA评分及治疗改善率,并进行统计学分析.结果:NLBP治疗组脱落 1 例、对照组脱落 2 例,纳入研究的NLBP 137 例.健康组与NLBP组的年龄、性别及BMI间差异无统计学意义,针灸治疗组与核心训练对照组的年龄、BMI、病程、治疗前各评分指标间差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).健康组腰三横突旁 1.5~2.5 cm处腰大肌的SWV值与NLBP患者相同部位腰大肌的SWV值有显著差异(P<0.01).治疗组与对照组经过 2个疗程治疗后,腰大肌的SWV值均降低,以治疗组下降明显,两种治疗方式的SWV值间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).两种治疗方式治疗前后的评分、治疗总有效率间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论:SWE技术通过定量检测腰大肌的弹性硬度,可反映针灸及核心稳定训练治疗NLBP的效果,且针灸治疗NLBP的疗效优于核心稳定训练.

Abstract

Objective:To explore the application value of shear wave elastography(SWE)in evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture and core stability training in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain(NLBP).Methods:From January 2022 to December 2023,140 patients with NLBP and 70 healthy individuals were selected from our hospital.The SWV values of the psoas major muscle were compared between NLBP patients and healthy individuals.NLBP patients were randomly divided into two groups in a 1∶1 ratio using a single-blind method:the treatment group received acupuncture,and the control group underwent core stability training for the lumbar and back muscles.Both groups received two treatment courses.After the treatment courses,the SWV values,VAS scores,JOA scores and treatment improvement rates of the two groups before and after treatment were compared and statistically analyzed.Results:One patient in the NLBP treatment group and two patients in the control group dropped out,137 NLBP patients were included in the study.There were no statistically significant differences in age,gender,and BMI between the healthy group and the NLBP group,and there were no statistically significant differences in age,BMI,disease duration,and pre-treatment scores between the acupuncture treatment group and the core training control group(P>0.05).There was a significant difference in the SWV values of the psoas major muscle 1.5~2.5 cm beside the lumbar transverse process between the healthy group and NLBP patients(P<0.01).After two treatment courses,the SWV of the psoas major muscle decreased in both the treatment and control groups,with a more significant decrease in the treatment group.The difference in SWV values between the two treatment methods was significant(P<0.01).There were statistically significant differences in the scores and total effective rates before and after treatment between the two treatment methods(P<0.01).Conclusion:SWE technology can quantitatively detect the elasticity and hardness of the psoas major muscle,reflecting the treatment effects of acupuncture and core stability training on NLBP.Moreover,acupuncture treatment is more effective than exercise therapy for NLBP.

关键词

腰痛/针灸疗法/超声检查

Key words

Lumbago/Acupuncture Moxibustion Therapy/Ultrasonography

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

上海市浦东新区卫生健康委面上项目(PW2021A-55)

上海市浦东新区重点专科项目(PWZzk2022-18)

出版年

2024
中国临床医学影像杂志
中国医学影像技术研究会,中国医科大学

中国临床医学影像杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.204
ISSN:1008-1062
参考文献量9
段落导航相关论文